Loggi Elisabetta, Galli Silvia, Vitale Giovanni, Di Donato Roberto, Vukotic Ranka, Grandini Elena, Margotti Marzia, Guarneri Valeria, Furlini Giuliano, Galli Claudio, Re Maria Carla, Andreone Pietro
Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Centro di Ricerca per lo Studio delle Epatiti, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Unità di Microbiologia, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 10;12(11):e0187755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187755. eCollection 2017.
To evaluate the potential value of using a serological assay to quantitate the hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCV-Ag) when monitoring patients with chronic hepatitis C being treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).
Ninety-six patients treated with DAAs, either alone (91) or in combination with PEG interferon (5), were tested for HCV-RNA and for HCV-Ag at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 during treatment and 12 weeks after completion. The concordance and correlation between the viral parameters as well as the respective kinetics during and after treatment were evaluated.
A sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 82 patients (91%), whereas 11 relapsed (R) and 1 showed a virological breakthrough while receiving treatment. HCV-RNA and HCV-Ag showed good concordance (kappa = 0.62) and correlation. No significant differences between SVR and R was observed in either assay at 2 and 4 weeks after the start of treatment. At 8 weeks, HCV-Ag showed higher accuracy than HCV-RNA (AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.55) and there was a significantly greater decrease from baseline in SVR than in R (4.01 vs. 3.36 log10; p<0.05).
Monitoring during treatment with DAAs by using either HCV-RNA or HCV-Ag has only a limited predictive value for SVR. Since those assays are equivalent for identifying a virological relapse, HCV-Ag may be preferred from an economical and organizational perspective.
评估在监测接受直接抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者时,使用血清学检测法定量丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原(HCV-Ag)的潜在价值。
对96例接受DAA治疗的患者进行检测,其中91例单独使用DAA,5例联合聚乙二醇干扰素,在基线、治疗期间的第2、4、8和12周以及治疗结束后12周检测HCV-RNA和HCV-Ag。评估病毒学参数之间的一致性和相关性以及治疗期间和治疗后的各自动力学。
82例患者(91%)实现持续病毒学应答(SVR),11例复发(R),1例在接受治疗时出现病毒学突破。HCV-RNA和HCV-Ag显示出良好的一致性(kappa = 0.62)和相关性。治疗开始后2周和4周时,两种检测方法在SVR和R之间均未观察到显著差异。在第8周时,HCV-Ag显示出比HCV-RNA更高的准确性(AUC:0.74对0.55),SVR组从基线的下降幅度显著大于R组(4.01对3.36 log10;p<0.05)。
在使用DAA治疗期间,通过检测HCV-RNA或HCV-Ag对SVR的预测价值有限。由于这些检测方法在识别病毒学复发方面相当,从经济和组织角度考虑,HCV-Ag可能更受青睐。