Narayan Sanjiv M, Vishwanathan Mohan N, Kowalewski Christopher A B, Baykaner Tina, Rodrigo Miguel, Zaman Junaid A B, Wang Paul J
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Rev Port Cardiol. 2017 Nov;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is central to ablation approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF), yet many patients still have arrhythmia recurrence after one or more procedures despite the latest technology for PVI. Ablation of rotational or focal sources for AF, which lie outside the pulmonary veins in many patients, is a practical approach that has been shown to improve success by many groups. Localized sources lie in atrial regions shown mechanistically to sustain AF in optical mapping and clinical studies of human AF, as well as computational and animal studies. Because they arise in localized atrial regions, AF sources may explain central paradoxes in clinical practice - such as how limited ablation in patient specific sites can terminate persistent AF yet extensive anatomical ablation at stereotypical locations, which should extinguish disordered waves, does not improve success in clinical trials. Ongoing studies may help to resolve many controversies in the field of rotational sources for AF. Studies now verify rotational activation by multiple mapping approaches in the same patients, at sites where ablation terminates persistent AF. However, these studies also show that certain mapping methods are less effective for detecting AF sources than others. It is also recognized that the success of AF source ablation is technique dependent. This review article provides a mechanistic and clinical rationale to ablate localized sources (rotational and focal), and describes successful techniques for their ablation as well as pitfalls to avoid. We hope that this review will serve as a platform for future improvements in the patient-tailored ablation for complex arrhythmias.
肺静脉隔离(PVI)是心房颤动(AF)消融治疗方法的核心,然而,尽管有最新的PVI技术,许多患者在接受一次或多次手术后仍会出现心律失常复发。对于许多患者来说,房颤的旋转或局灶性起源位于肺静脉之外,对其进行消融是一种实用的方法,许多研究小组已证明这种方法能提高成功率。局灶性起源位于心房区域,在人体房颤的光学标测和临床研究以及计算和动物研究中,从机制上显示这些区域维持房颤。由于房颤起源于局灶性心房区域,这可能解释了临床实践中的一些核心悖论,例如在特定患者部位进行有限的消融如何能终止持续性房颤,而在 stereotypical 位置进行广泛的解剖消融,本应消除紊乱的电波,但在临床试验中却不能提高成功率。正在进行的研究可能有助于解决房颤旋转起源领域的许多争议。目前的研究通过多种标测方法在同一患者中、在消融终止持续性房颤的部位验证了旋转激活。然而,这些研究也表明,某些标测方法在检测房颤起源方面比其他方法效果更差。人们还认识到,房颤起源消融的成功取决于技术。这篇综述文章为消融局灶性起源(旋转性和局灶性)提供了机制和临床依据,并描述了成功的消融技术以及需要避免的陷阱。我们希望这篇综述将成为未来改进复杂心律失常个体化消融治疗的一个平台。