Stanford University, Stanford.
San Diego VA Medical Center.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;3(4):393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.10.006.
The role of atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates is unclear in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) that recurs after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We hypothesized that patients with recurrent post-ablation (redo) PAF despite PVI have electrical substrates marked by rotors and focal sources, and structural substrates that resemble persistent AF more than patients with (de novo) PAF at first ablation.
In 175 patients at 11 centers, we compared AF substrates in both atria using 64 pole-basket catheters and phase mapping, and indices of anatomical remodeling between patients with de novo or redo PAF and first ablation for persistent AF.
Sources were seen in all patients. More patients with de novo PAF (78.0%) had sources near PVs than patients with redo PAF (47.4%, p=0.005) or persistent AF (46.9%, p=0.001). The total number of sources per patient (p=0.444), and number of non-PV sources (p=0.701) were similar between groups, indicating that redo PAF patients had residual non-PV sources after elimination of PV sources by prior PVI. Structurally, left atrial size did not separate de novo from redo PAF (49.5±9.5 vs. 49.0±7.1mm, p=0.956) but was larger in patients with persistent AF (55.2±8.4mm, p=0.001).
Patients with paroxysmal AF despite prior PVI show electrical substrates that resemble persistent AF more closely than patients with paroxysmal AF at first ablation. Notably, these subgroups of paroxysmal AF are indistinguishable by structural indices. These data motivate studies of trigger versus substrate mechanisms for patients with recurrent paroxysmal AF after PVI.
阵发性心房颤动(PAF)患者在肺静脉隔离(PVI)后复发的情况下,心房颤动(AF)的基质作用尚不清楚。我们假设,尽管进行了 PVI,但仍有复发性消融后(redo)PAF 的患者,其电基质具有转子和局灶性源的特征,并且结构基质与首次消融时的持续性 AF 更相似,而不是新发的 PAF。
在 11 个中心的 175 名患者中,我们使用 64 极篮状导管和相位映射比较了新发和 redo PAF 患者的双侧心房 AF 基质,以及新发和 redo PAF 患者与首次消融持续性 AF 患者之间解剖重构的指标。
所有患者均可见源。与 redo PAF 患者(47.4%,p=0.005)或持续性 AF 患者(46.9%,p=0.001)相比,新发 PAF 患者(78.0%)更靠近 PV 的源。每位患者的源总数(p=0.444)和非-PV 源数量(p=0.701)相似,表明 redo PAF 患者在先前的 PVI 消除了 PV 源后,仍有残余的非-PV 源。结构上,左心房大小不能将新发和 redo PAF 区分开(49.5±9.5 vs. 49.0±7.1mm,p=0.956),但在持续性 AF 患者中更大(55.2±8.4mm,p=0.001)。
尽管先前进行了 PVI,但阵发性 AF 患者的电基质更接近持续性 AF,而不是首次消融时的阵发性 AF。值得注意的是,这些阵发性 AF 的亚组不能通过结构指数来区分。这些数据为研究 PVI 后复发性阵发性 AF 患者的触发与基质机制提供了动力。