Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina.
Department of Public Health Sciences MUSC, Charleston, South Carolina.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec;26(12):1795-1803. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0460. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Most studies of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) compare self-selected users versus nonusers. The few randomized studies to date generally support a positive impact on reducing smoking behavior, but these studies are focused on guided ENDS use. This study presents a randomized, naturalistic trial of ENDS with prospective outcomes of uptake and behavioral changes in smoking. Adult smokers with minimal ENDS history were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive product for 3 weeks ( = 46), or not ( = 22). Changes in nicotine delivery (16 vs. 24 mg), midway through the study allowed a compelling opportunity to examine two ENDS products compared with the control group. Primary outcomes, assessed via daily diaries during sampling period and in-person laboratory visits over 4 months, included uptake and usage of ENDS, cessation-related outcomes, and exposure to smoke constituents. All ENDS participants tried product at least once, with 48% of 24 mg and 30% of 16 mg using their assigned product for the entire sampling period. Within the 24 mg ENDs group, 57% made an independent purchase of ENDS, versus 28% of 16 mg, and 14% of control participants ( = 0.01). Smokers in both ENDS groups significantly reduced their smoking, whereas control participants did not ( = 0.03). Cessation behaviors (quit attempts, biologically verified abstinence) numerically but not statistically favored ENDS participants. Results suggest that cigarette smokers are willing to use ENDS with trends toward reduced cigarette smoking and positive changes in cessation-related behaviors. Randomized, naturalistic trials such as presented herein are needed to understand the population impact of e-cigarettes. .
大多数关于电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的研究都是将自我选择的使用者与非使用者进行比较。迄今为止,少数随机研究通常支持对减少吸烟行为产生积极影响,但这些研究都集中在指导 ENDS 使用上。本研究报告了一项关于 ENDS 的随机、自然主义试验,前瞻性地评估了吸烟行为的使用和变化。具有最低 ENDS 使用史的成年吸烟者以 2:1 的比例随机分配接受产品 3 周(n = 46)或不接受产品(n = 22)。在研究进行到一半时,尼古丁输送量的变化(16 毫克对 24 毫克)为我们提供了一个很好的机会,来比较两种 ENDS 产品与对照组的差异。主要结果通过在采样期间的每日日记和 4 个月内的面对面实验室访问进行评估,包括 ENDS 的使用和使用情况、与戒烟相关的结果以及对烟雾成分的暴露情况。所有 ENDS 参与者都至少尝试过一次产品,24 毫克组中有 48%,16 毫克组中有 30%的参与者在整个采样期间都使用他们分配到的产品。在 24 毫克 ENDS 组中,有 57%的人独立购买了 ENDS,而 16 毫克组为 28%,对照组为 14%(p = 0.01)。两个 ENDS 组的吸烟者都显著减少了吸烟量,而对照组没有(p = 0.03)。虽然没有统计学意义,但在戒烟行为(戒烟尝试、生物验证的戒烟)方面,ENDS 参与者有明显的优势。结果表明,香烟吸烟者愿意使用 ENDS,趋势是减少吸烟量,并对戒烟相关行为产生积极影响。像本文所展示的那样,需要进行随机、自然主义试验来了解电子烟对人群的影响。