European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027, Ispra, Italy.
National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Morrisville, NC, 27709, USA.
Arch Toxicol. 2018 Feb;92(2):611-617. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2097-4. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Skin sensitisation is the regulatory endpoint that has been at the centre of concerted efforts to replace animal testing in recent years, as demonstrated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) adoption of five non-animal methods addressing mechanisms under the first three key events of the skin sensitisation adverse outcome pathway. Nevertheless, the currently adopted methods, when used in isolation, are not sufficient to fulfil regulatory requirements on the skin sensitisation potential and potency of chemicals comparable to that provided by the regulatory animal tests. For this reason, a number of defined approaches integrating data from these methods with other relevant information have been proposed and documented by the OECD. With the aim to further enhance regulatory consideration and adoption of defined approaches, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal testing in collaboration with the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods hosted, on 4-5 October 2016, a workshop on the international regulatory applicability and acceptance of alternative non-animal approaches, i.e., defined approaches, to skin sensitisation assessment of chemicals used in a variety of sectors. The workshop convened representatives from more than 20 regulatory authorities from the European Union, United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Brazil and China. There was a general consensus among the workshop participants that to maximise global regulatory acceptance of data generated with defined approaches, international harmonisation and standardisation are needed. Potential assessment criteria were defined for a systematic evaluation of existing defined approaches that would facilitate their translation into international standards, e.g., into a performance-based Test Guideline. Informed by the discussions at the workshop, the ICATM members propose practical ways to further promote the regulatory use and facilitate adoption of defined approaches for skin sensitisation assessments.
皮肤致敏是近年来替代动物测试的中心焦点,这一点在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)采用五种非动物方法来解决皮肤致敏不良结局途径的前三个关键事件的机制中得到了证明。然而,目前采用的方法,当单独使用时,不足以满足对化学品皮肤致敏潜力和效力的监管要求,其与监管动物测试提供的要求相比是不充分的。出于这个原因,OECD 提出并记录了一些将这些方法的数据与其他相关信息整合的方法。为了进一步增强对定义方法的监管考虑和采用,欧盟替代动物测试参考实验室与国际替代测试方法合作组织于 2016 年 10 月 4 日至 5 日举办了一个关于替代非动物方法(即定义方法)在用于各种行业的化学品皮肤致敏评估中的国际监管适用性和接受度的研讨会。该研讨会召集了来自欧盟、美国、加拿大、日本、韩国、巴西和中国的 20 多个监管机构的代表。研讨会参与者普遍认为,为了使全球监管部门最大程度地接受使用定义方法生成的数据,需要进行国际协调和标准化。为了便于将现有的定义方法转化为国际标准,例如转化为基于性能的测试指南,为系统评估现有定义方法定义了潜在的评估标准。根据研讨会的讨论,ICATM 成员提出了进一步促进监管使用和便利采用定义方法进行皮肤致敏评估的实用方法。