Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Director of Gynecologic Services, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jan;46:120-139. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
Endometrial ablation (EA) includes a spectrum of procedures performed with or without hysteroscopic direction, designed to destroy the endometrium for the treatment of the symptom of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) secondary to a spectrum of causes, but most commonly those that are endometrial in origin (AUB-E) or ovulatory disorders (AUB-O). Resectoscopic endometrial ablation (REA) is often mistakenly referred to as the "first generation" technique, while proprietary devices that do not use the resectoscope (nonresectoscopic EA or NREA) are often misperceived as "second generation" devices. Indeed, the origins of NREA date back to the late 19th century with the use of steam, and the early and mid 20th century, when radiofrequency and cryotherapy based NREA techniques were published - long before the resectoscope was used and reported. The NREA devices have also been mislabeled as "global", a misleading term borrowed from the marketing departments of device manufacturers - there is no device that predictably treats the entire endometrium. Consequently, none can be construed as being "global". Instead, EA is a procedure designed for women as an alternative to hysterectomy, or, perhaps, medical therapy, when future fertility is no longer desired. Women who select EA should anticipate a relatively low risk procedure that will likely reduce their HMB to normal levels or less. This paper will review the spectrum of EA techniques and devices, their clinical outcomes and adverse events, and explore their value compared to hysterectomy and selected medical therapies.
子宫内膜消融术 (EA) 包括一系列有或无宫腔镜指导的手术,旨在破坏子宫内膜,以治疗因各种原因引起的月经过多 (HMB) 症状,但最常见的原因是子宫内膜源性 (AUB-E) 或排卵障碍性 (AUB-O)。经阴道镜子宫内膜切除术 (REA) 常被错误地称为“第一代”技术,而不使用阴道镜的专有设备(非经阴道镜子宫内膜消融术或 NREA)常被误解为“第二代”设备。实际上,NREA 的起源可以追溯到 19 世纪末期使用蒸汽,以及 20 世纪早期和中期,当时发布了基于射频和冷冻的 NREA 技术——远在使用和报告阴道镜之前。NREA 设备也被错误地贴上了“全球”的标签,这是一个误导性的术语,是从设备制造商的营销部门借来的——没有一种设备可以预测性地治疗整个子宫内膜。因此,不能将它们解释为“全球”。相反,EA 是一种为希望保留生育能力的女性设计的替代子宫切除术或可能的药物治疗的手术。选择 EA 的女性应该预期手术风险相对较低,这可能会将她们的 HMB 降低到正常水平或更低水平。本文将回顾 EA 技术和设备的范围,它们的临床结果和不良事件,并探讨与子宫切除术和选定的药物治疗相比的价值。