• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节内注射后膝关节深部感染的危险因素和临床特征:一项匹配回顾性队列分析。

Risk factors and clinical characteristics of deep knee infection in patients with intra-articular injections: A matched retrospective cohort analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jun;47(6):911-916. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.013
PMID:29129326
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep knee infection (DKI), consisting of sepsis arthritis (SA) and chronic low-grade infection (CLGI), is a rare but catastrophic adverse event that can result from intra-articular (IA) injections. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for DKI and describe the clinical characteristics of DKI in patients who received IA injections.

METHODS

Fifty patients with IA injection-induced DKI who underwent surgical treatment between January 2010 and May 2016 served as cases and were matched with non-infected controls who received IA injections in a proportion of 1:5 based on age, gender, and date of admission. All IA injections (both cases and controls) were performed within 6 months of admission at our institution or at a referring institution. Risk factors for injection-induced DKI were analyzed, and the clinical characteristics between SA and CLGI were compared.

RESULTS

The final multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that body mass index ≥25kg/m [odds ratio (OR) = 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-4.7], corticosteroid injections (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.63-6.31), rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.20-5.68) and injections performed by general practitioners (OR = 5.23; 95% CI: 2.00-13.67) increased the risk of DKI following IA injections. Of 50 cases, there were 21 SA cases and 29 CLGI cases. SA cases had significantly higher metrics in the categories of fever, local warmth, swelling, rest pain, night pain, limited motion, serum WBC, and CRP levels than CLGI cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified risk factors and clinical characteristics of injection-induced DKI, which may offer improved guidance on IA injections and knowledge of DKI in patients with IA injections, especially in CLGI patients.

摘要

背景

深膝感染(DKI)由脓毒性关节炎(SA)和慢性低度感染(CLGI)组成,是一种罕见但灾难性的不良事件,可由关节内(IA)注射引起。本研究旨在评估 DKI 的危险因素,并描述接受 IA 注射的患者中 DKI 的临床特征。

方法

50 例因 IA 注射引起的 DKI 患者接受手术治疗,纳入病例组,并按照年龄、性别和入院日期,按 1:5 的比例与接受 IA 注射但未发生感染的对照组进行匹配。所有 IA 注射(病例组和对照组)均在我院或转诊医院入院后 6 个月内进行。分析 IA 注射引起 DKI 的危险因素,并比较 SA 和 CLGI 之间的临床特征。

结果

最终的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,体重指数≥25kg/m²(优势比[OR] = 2.3;95%置信区间[CI]:1.1-4.7)、皮质类固醇注射(OR = 3.21;95%CI:1.63-6.31)、类风湿关节炎(OR = 2.61;95%CI:1.20-5.68)和全科医生进行的注射(OR = 5.23;95%CI:2.00-13.67)增加了 IA 注射后发生 DKI 的风险。在 50 例病例中,有 21 例 SA 病例和 29 例 CLGI 病例。SA 病例在发热、局部发热、肿胀、静息痛、夜间疼痛、活动受限、血清白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白水平等方面的指标明显高于 CLGI 病例。

结论

我们确定了 IA 注射引起 DKI 的危险因素和临床特征,这可能为 IA 注射提供更好的指导,并提高对 IA 注射患者 DKI 的认识,特别是在 CLGI 患者中。

相似文献

1
Risk factors and clinical characteristics of deep knee infection in patients with intra-articular injections: A matched retrospective cohort analysis.关节内注射后膝关节深部感染的危险因素和临床特征:一项匹配回顾性队列分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Jun;47(6):911-916. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
2
Comparison of Infection Risk with Corticosteroid or Hyaluronic Acid Injection Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术前使用皮质类固醇或透明质酸注射的感染风险比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 16;101(2):112-118. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00454.
3
Intra-Articular, Single-Shot Hylan G-F 20 Hyaluronic Acid Injection Compared with Corticosteroid in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.膝关节骨关节炎中关节内单次注射透明质酸凝胶Hylan G-F 20与皮质类固醇的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 1;98(11):885-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00544.
4
Low frequency of septic arthritis after arthrocentesis and intra-articular glucocorticoid injection.关节穿刺及关节内糖皮质激素注射后发生脓毒性关节炎的频率较低。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;48(5):393-397. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1584329. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Injectable corticosteroids in treatment of arthritis of the knee.注射用皮质类固醇治疗膝关节炎
Am J Med. 2005 Nov;118(11):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.05.003.
6
Factors Associated with the Use of Hyaluronic Acid and Corticosteroid Injections among Patients with Radiographically Confirmed Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Data Analysis.影像学确诊的膝关节骨关节炎患者中透明质酸和皮质类固醇注射使用的相关因素:一项回顾性数据分析
Clin Ther. 2017 Feb;39(2):347-358. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
7
Intra-Articular Knee Injections Before Total Knee Arthroplasty: Outcomes and Complication Rates.全膝关节置换术前膝关节腔内注射:结果与并发症发生率
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1798-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.041. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Prior Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection Within 3 Months May Increase the Risk of Deep Infection in Subsequent Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.3 个月内关节内皮质类固醇注射可能增加后续关节置换术后深部感染的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):971-979. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002055. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
9
A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of EUFLEXXA for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee, with an open-label safety extension (the FLEXX trial).一项关于优力氟昔(EUFLEXXA)治疗膝部疼痛性骨关节炎疗效和安全性的双盲、随机、生理盐水对照研究,并进行开放标签安全性扩展研究(FLEXX试验)。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug;39(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
10
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections increase the risk of requiring knee arthroplasty.关节内皮质类固醇注射会增加膝关节置换的风险。
Bone Joint J. 2020 May;102-B(5):586-592. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1376.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Liposome-Based Interventions in Knee Osteoarthritis.基于脂质体的膝关节骨关节炎干预措施
Small. 2025 Apr;21(17):e2410060. doi: 10.1002/smll.202410060. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
[Septic musculoskeletal complications under immunomodulating treatment].[免疫调节治疗下的脓毒性肌肉骨骼并发症]
Z Rheumatol. 2025 May;84(4):288-294. doi: 10.1007/s00393-024-01595-8. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
3
Intra-articular steroids for the treatment of coxarthrosis; a retrospective cohort study comparing three contrast techniques.关节内类固醇治疗髋关节骨关节炎; 三种对比技术的回顾性队列研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jul;144(7):2935-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05371-w. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
How safe are intra-articular corticosteroid injections to the hip?髋关节腔内皮质类固醇注射有多安全?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 22;24(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06766-3.
5
At the Edge of Orthopaedics: Initial Experience with Transarterial Periarticular Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis in a Romanian Population.在骨科前沿:罗马尼亚人群中经动脉关节周围栓塞治疗膝骨关节炎的初步经验。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 5;11(21):6573. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216573.
6
Septic Arthritis With Superimposed Acute Gouty Arthritis in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient.类风湿关节炎患者合并感染性关节炎及急性痛风性关节炎
Cureus. 2022 Apr 21;14(4):e24352. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24352. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Septic arthritis following joint injections: a 17 years retrospective study in an Academic General Hospital.关节注射后感染性关节炎:一家学术综合医院的 17 年回顾性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jan 19;92(6):e2021308. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i6.10425.
8
Septic Arthritis Masquerading as a Flare of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Not So Straightforward Diagnosis.伪装成类风湿关节炎发作的化脓性关节炎:并非那么简单的诊断
Cureus. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):e18336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18336. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Septic arthritis caused by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicrom: A case report and review.由微小拟杆菌引起的化脓性关节炎:一例报告及文献复习
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2021 Dec;34(6):675-678. doi: 10.37201/req/067.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint following deltoid intramuscular vaccination.三角肌肌内接种后盂肱关节化脓性关节炎。
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 May 25;14(5):e243066. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-243066.