• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的卵巢癌中心化治疗:诊断医院不再决定患者接受手术的概率。

Centralization of ovarian cancer in the Netherlands: Hospital of diagnosis no longer determines patients' probability of undergoing surgery.

机构信息

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.009
PMID:29129391
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgical care for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients has been centralized in the Netherlands since 2012. We evaluated whether the likelihood for patients to undergo surgery depends on the hospital of initial diagnosis before and after centralization of surgical care.

METHODS

Patients with EOC FIGO stage IIB-IV, diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2015, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Multilevel multivariate logistic regression was used to study the association between hospital of diagnosis and patients' likelihood of undergoing surgery in subsequent time periods. Furthermore, changes in overall survival were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

15,314 EOC patients were selected from the NCR. Hospital of diagnosis was identified as a significant level for patients' likelihood of undergoing surgery in 2000-2005 (LR test p<0.001), as well as in 2006-2011 (LR test p=0.002) but not in 2012-2015 (LR test p=0.127). Patients who underwent surgery in 2012-2015 had a better survival when compared to 2006-2011 (HR 0.90(0.84-0.96)).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that centralization of surgical care resolved the variation between hospitals in the probability to undergo cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced EOC. Since centralization was established in 2012, the decision to operate patients seems solely attributable to patient and tumor characteristics. This supports the growing evidence in favor of centralizing (surgical) treatment for complex and heterogeneous diseases such as EOC.

摘要

目的

自 2012 年以来,荷兰已经将晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的外科治疗集中化。我们评估了在外科治疗集中化之前和之后,患者接受手术的可能性是否取决于初始诊断的医院。

方法

从荷兰癌症登记处确定了 2000 年至 2015 年间在荷兰诊断为 FIGO 分期 IIB-IV 期的上皮性卵巢癌患者。使用多水平多变量逻辑回归研究了诊断医院与患者随后手术可能性之间的关联。此外,通过多变量 Cox 回归模型分析了总生存率的变化。

结果

从 NCR 中选择了 15314 名上皮性卵巢癌患者。诊断医院被确定为 2000-2005 年(LR 检验 p<0.001)以及 2006-2011 年(LR 检验 p=0.002)患者接受手术可能性的显著水平,但在 2012-2015 年(LR 检验 p=0.127)则不然。与 2006-2011 年相比,2012-2015 年接受手术的患者生存情况更好(HR 0.90(0.84-0.96))。

结论

本研究表明,外科治疗的集中化解决了晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者接受细胞减灭术的概率在医院之间的差异。自 2012 年集中化建立以来,对患者进行手术的决策似乎仅归因于患者和肿瘤特征。这支持了越来越多的证据,即支持将复杂和异质疾病(如上皮性卵巢癌)的治疗集中化(手术)。

相似文献

1
Centralization of ovarian cancer in the Netherlands: Hospital of diagnosis no longer determines patients' probability of undergoing surgery.荷兰的卵巢癌中心化治疗:诊断医院不再决定患者接受手术的概率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
Improved outcomes due to changes in organization of care for patients with ovarian cancer in the Netherlands.荷兰卵巢癌患者护理组织的改变带来了更好的治疗效果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jun;141(3):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
3
The National Cancer Database report on advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of hospital surgical case volume on overall survival and surgical treatment paradigm.国家癌症数据库报告:晚期上皮性卵巢癌:医院手术病例量对总生存和手术治疗模式的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Sep;118(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.025. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
Oncologic outcomes after splenectomy during initial cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study.在初始细胞减灭术时行脾切除术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的肿瘤学结局:一项全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):56-67. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14286. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
Non-surgical management of ovarian cancer: Prevalence and implications.卵巢癌的非手术治疗:患病率及影响
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jul;142(1):30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 May 5.
6
Outcome of surgery in advanced ovarian cancer varies between geographical regions; opportunities for improvement in The Netherlands.不同地区晚期卵巢癌的手术治疗效果不同;荷兰存在改进的机会。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1425-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Trends in therapy and survival of advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the Netherlands.荷兰晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者治疗和生存趋势。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):649-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Trends and factors associated with radical cytoreductive surgery in the United States: A case for centralized care.美国根治性细胞减灭术的相关趋势及因素:集中化护理的必要性
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jun;145(3):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Centralisation of epithelial ovarian cancer surgery: results on survival from a peripheral teaching hospital.上皮性卵巢癌手术的集中化:一家外围教学医院的生存结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Sep;192:72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Intestinal surgery in treatment of advanced ovarian cancer--review of our experience.肠道手术治疗晚期卵巢癌——我们的经验回顾
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(4):419-22.

引用本文的文献

1
A prognostic model for ovarian neoplasms established by an integrated analysis of 1580 transcriptomic profiles.基于 1580 个转录组谱的综合分析建立的卵巢肿瘤预后模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 8;13(1):19429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45410-x.
2
British Gynaecological Cancer Society Recommendations for Evidence Based, Population Data Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Ovarian Cancer.英国妇科癌症协会关于基于证据的、源自人群数据的卵巢癌质量绩效指标的建议。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;15(2):337. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020337.
3
Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Reference Centers for Complex Cancer Diseases: A Source of Health Inequalities? A Population Cohort Study Based on Catalonia (Spain).
社会经济地位与复杂癌症疾病参照中心的距离:健康不平等的根源?基于加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)的人群队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;19(14):8814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148814.
4
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementation of universal tumor DNA testing in ovarian cancer patients: multidisciplinary focus groups.医护人员对在卵巢癌患者中实施肿瘤通用 DNA 检测的看法:多学科焦点小组。
Fam Cancer. 2023 Jan;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00294-0. Epub 2022 May 16.