Cabanas-Sánchez Verónica, Martínez-Gómez David, Esteban-Cornejo Irene, Castro-Piñero José, Conde-Caveda Julio, Veiga Óscar L
Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Autonomous University of Madrid, Cantoblanco University City, Spain.
Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Autonomous University of Madrid, Cantoblanco University City, Spain; Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Granada, Spain.
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jan;21(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.031. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
To develop a questionnaire able to assess time spent by youth in a wide range of leisure-time sedentary behaviors (SB) and evaluate its test-retest reliability and criterion validity.
Cross-sectional observational.
The reliability sample included 194 youth, aged 10-18 years, who completed the questionnaire twice, separated by one-week interval. The validity study comprised 1207 participants aged 8-18 years. Participants wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days. The questionnaire was designed to assess the amount of time spent in twelve different SB during weekdays and weekends, separately. In order to avoid usual phenomenon of time over reporting, values were adjusted to real available leisure-time (LT) for each participant. Reliability was assessed by using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and weighted (quadratic) kappa (k), and validity was assessed by using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots.
The reliability of questionnaire showed a moderate-to-substantial agreement for the most (91%) of items (k=0.43-0.74; ICC=0.41-0.79) with three items (4%) reaching an almost perfect agreement (ICC=0.82-0.83). Only 'sitting and talking' evidenced fair-to-moderate reliability (k=0.27-0.39; ICC=0.34-0.46). The relationship between average sedentary time assessed by the questionnaire and accelerometry was moderate (r=0.36; p<0.001). Systematic biases were not found between questionnaire and accelerometer sedentary time for average day (r=0.05; p=0.11) but Bland-Altman plots suggest moderate discrepancies between both methods of SB measurement (mean=19.86; limits of agreement=-280.04 to 319.76).
The questionnaire showed moderate to good test-retest reliability and a moderate level of validity for assessing SB in youth, similar or slightly better to previously published in this population.
编制一份问卷,以评估青少年在各种休闲久坐行为(SB)上花费的时间,并评估其重测信度和效标效度。
横断面观察性研究。
信度样本包括194名10至18岁的青少年,他们分两次完成问卷,间隔一周。效度研究包括1207名8至18岁的参与者。参与者连续7天佩戴加速度计。该问卷旨在分别评估工作日和周末在12种不同久坐行为上花费的时间。为避免时间高估的常见现象,对每个参与者的时间值进行调整,以反映实际可利用的休闲时间(LT)。采用组内相关系数(ICC)和加权(二次)kappa系数(k)评估信度,采用Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman图评估效度。
问卷的信度显示,大多数(91%)项目具有中度到高度一致性(k = 0.43 - 0.74;ICC = 0.41 - 0.79),有三个项目(4%)达到几乎完美的一致性(ICC = 0.82 - 0.83)。只有“坐着交谈”显示出中等偏低的信度(k = 0.27 - 0.39;ICC = 0.34 - 0.46)。问卷评估的平均久坐时间与加速度计测量结果之间的关系为中度相关(r = 0.36;p < 0.001)。在平均日的问卷和加速度计久坐时间之间未发现系统偏差(r = 0.05;p = 0.11),但Bland-Altman图表明两种久坐行为测量方法之间存在中度差异(均值 = 19.86;一致性界限 = -280.04至319.76)。
该问卷在评估青少年久坐行为方面显示出中度到良好的重测信度和中等水平的效度,与此前针对该人群发表的研究结果相似或略好。