Suppr超能文献

成年人过去一天的久坐时间回忆:可靠性、有效性和反应性。

Adults' past-day recall of sedentary time: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

机构信息

The University of Queensland, School of Population Health, Cancer Prevention Research Centre, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jun;45(6):1198-207. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182837f57.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Past-day recall rather than recall of past week or a usual/typical day may improve the validity of self-reported sedentary time measures. This study examined the test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and responsiveness of the seven-item questionnaire, Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time (PAST).

METHODS

Participants (breast cancer survivors, n = 90, age = 33-75 yr, body mass index = 25-40 kg·m) in a 6-month randomized controlled trial of a lifestyle-based weight loss intervention completed the interviewer-administered PAST questionnaire about time spent sitting/lying on the previous day for work, transport, television viewing, nonwork computer use, reading, hobbies, and other purposes (summed for total sedentary time). The instrument was administered at baseline, 7 d later for test-retest reliability (n = 86), and at follow-up. ActivPAL3-assessed sit/lie time in bouts of ≥5 min during waking hours on the recall day was used as the validity criterion measure at both baseline (n = 72) and follow-up (n = 68). Analyses included intraclass correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlations (r), and Bland-Altman plots and responsiveness index.

RESULTS

The PAST had fair to good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.64). At baseline, the correlation between PAST and activPAL sit/lie time was r = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.39-0.71). The mean difference between PAST at baseline and retest was -25 min (5.2%), 95% limits of agreement = -5.9 to 5.0 h, and the activPAL sit/lie time was -9 min (1.8%), 95% limits of agreement = -4.9 to 4.6 h. The PAST showed small but significant responsiveness (-0.44, 95% CI = -0.92 to -0.04); responsiveness of activPAL sit/lie time was not significant.

CONCLUSION

The PAST questionnaire provided an easy-to-administer measure of sedentary time in this sample. Validity and reliability findings compare favorably with other sedentary time questionnaires. Past-day recall of sedentary time shows promise for use in future health behavior, epidemiological, and population surveillance studies.

摘要

目的

相较于回顾过去一周或典型一天的时间,回顾过去一天的时间可能会提高自我报告的久坐时间测量的有效性。本研究旨在检验七项问卷过去一天成人久坐时间(PAST)的重测信度、效标效度和反应度。

方法

在一项为期 6 个月的生活方式为基础的减肥干预随机对照试验中,90 名参与者(乳腺癌幸存者,年龄 33-75 岁,BMI 为 25-40 kg·m)完成了由调查员管理的 PAST 问卷,问卷内容为前一天因工作、交通、看电视、非工作用电脑、阅读、爱好和其他目的而坐着/躺着的时间(总计为久坐时间)。该工具在基线时、7 天后(重测信度,n = 86)和随访时进行了管理。在回忆日,在清醒时间内以 ≥5 分钟为一个时间段记录的 ActivPAL3 评估的坐/躺时间作为两个时间点(基线,n = 72;随访,n = 68)的有效性标准测量。分析包括组内相关系数、皮尔逊相关系数(r)、Bland-Altman 图和反应度指数。

结果

PAST 具有良好的重测信度(组内相关系数 = 0.50,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.32-0.64)。在基线时,PAST 与 ActivPAL 坐/躺时间的相关性为 r = 0.57(95% CI = 0.39-0.71)。PAST 在基线和重测之间的平均差异为 -25 分钟(5.2%),95%一致性界限= -5.9 至 5.0 小时,ActivPAL 的坐/躺时间为 -9 分钟(1.8%),95%一致性界限= -4.9 至 4.6 小时。PAST 显示出较小但有统计学意义的反应度(-0.44,95% CI = -0.92 至 -0.04);ActivPAL 坐/躺时间的反应度不显著。

结论

在该样本中,PAST 问卷提供了一种易于管理的久坐时间测量方法。有效性和可靠性的发现与其他久坐时间问卷相当。过去一天的久坐时间回顾有望用于未来的健康行为、流行病学和人群监测研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验