Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Oncology Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese medicine, Guangzhou, China.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):973-978. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Low-income patients face barriers to palliative care access, which might negatively influence symptom management and advanced care planning.
Our aim was to compare time of referral and characteristics (level of symptom distress) among uninsured (indigent), low-insured (Medicaid), and insured patients presenting to our supportive care center (SCC).
We conducted a retrospective review of randomly selected 100 indigent, 100 Medicaid, and 300 insured outpatients referred during the same five-year period. We reviewed demographic and clinical characteristics including date of diagnosis of advanced cancer and of first visit to SCC, symptom assessment (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), type and dose of opioid medication, number of total outpatient visits, and date of last contact with palliative care team.
Among 482 evaluable patients, indigent, Medicaid, and insured patients, respectively, had mean (SD) ages of 48 (11), 50 (12), and 63 (13) years (P < 0.001); Edmonton Symptom Assessment System pain scores at first visit of 6.7 (2.5), 5.6 (3.2), and 4.9 (3.2) (P < 0.001); nonwhite race in 60%, 49%, and 25% of cases (P < 0.001); unmarried status in 68%, 64%, and 33% of cases (P < 0.001), while 63%, 87%, and 54% of patients (P < 0.001) were on opioids with median number of encounters per month of 0.6, 0.8, and 0.5 (P = 0.001). Median survival (95% CI) from first visit to last contact was 4.6 (2.8-6.2), 5.4 (3.5-7), and 5.6 (4.7-7.3) months (P = 0.036).
Patients with limited or no insurance had significantly higher pain and were more frequently on opioids, younger, nonwhite, and not married. They required higher number of SCC follow-up visits. Insurance status did not affect timing of SCC referral or follow-ups at our cancer center.
低收入患者在获得姑息治疗方面面临障碍,这可能会对症状管理和晚期护理计划产生负面影响。
我们的目的是比较向我们的支持性护理中心(SCC)就诊的未参保(贫困)、低参保(医疗补助)和有保险患者的转诊时间和特征(症状困扰程度)。
我们对在同一五年期间随机选择的 100 名贫困、100 名医疗补助和 300 名有保险的门诊患者进行了回顾性审查。我们回顾了人口统计学和临床特征,包括晚期癌症的诊断日期和首次就诊 SCC 的日期、症状评估(埃德蒙顿症状评估系统)、阿片类药物的类型和剂量、总门诊就诊次数以及最后一次与姑息治疗团队联系的日期。
在 482 名可评估患者中,贫困、医疗补助和有保险患者的平均(SD)年龄分别为 48(11)、50(12)和 63(13)岁(P<0.001);首次就诊时的埃德蒙顿症状评估系统疼痛评分分别为 6.7(2.5)、5.6(3.2)和 4.9(3.2)(P<0.001);非白人种族分别占 60%、49%和 25%(P<0.001);未婚状态分别占 68%、64%和 33%(P<0.001),而 63%、87%和 54%的患者(P<0.001)接受了阿片类药物治疗,每月就诊中位数分别为 0.6、0.8 和 0.5(P=0.001)。从首次就诊到最后一次联系的中位生存时间(95%CI)分别为 4.6(2.8-6.2)、5.4(3.5-7)和 5.6(4.7-7.3)个月(P=0.036)。
有限或没有保险的患者疼痛明显更高,更常使用阿片类药物,更年轻、非白人且未婚。他们需要更多的 SCC 随访就诊。在我们的癌症中心,保险状况并不影响 SCC 的转诊时间或随访。