Suppr超能文献

食管癌食管切除术后吻合口漏的评估:典型发生时间点、诊断方式、常规造影剂检查的价值及治疗选择

Evaluation of Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Typical Time Point of Occurrence, Mode of Diagnosis, Value of Routine Radiocontrast Agent Studies and Therapeutic Options.

作者信息

Struecker Benjamin, Andreou Andreas, Chopra Sascha, Heilmann Ann-Christin, Spenke Johanna, Denecke Christian, Sauer Igor Maximilian, Bahra Marcus, Pratschke Johann, Biebl Matthias

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2018;35(5):419-426. doi: 10.1159/000480357. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on the typical time point of occurrence of anastomotic leak (AL) after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer are currently scarce. Therefore, the usefulness of routine radiocontrast agent studies (RRCS) for testing proper healing of the anastomosis after esophagectomy remains unclear. Furthermore, preferred available tools to diagnose postoperative AL and therapeutic options are still under debate.

METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis of 328 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2015. A RRCS has been performed to date in our center on the fifth postoperative day (POD), before returning to normal oral intake.

RESULTS

In total, 49 of 328 patients developed AL after esophagectomy (15%). A total of 11 patients (23%) developed AL before the RRCS and 34 patients (69%) after an unremarkable RRCS; and 4 patients (8%) with AL were diagnosed by RRCS, resulting in overall sensitivity of 16%. The median time point of occurrence of AL was POD 9, the majority of AL (84%) occurred between POD 1 and 19. Computed tomography led to the diagnosis of AL in 41% of patients. The most frequent therapy of AL was stenting in 47% of patients. Endoscopic vacuum therapy was used in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of AL occurred within the first 3 weeks after esophagectomy without a typical time point. In our series, RRCS on the fifth POD had a low sensitivity of 16%. Therefore, standardized RRCS and fasting till the examination cannot be generally recommended. In case of clinical suspicion of AL, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen with oral contrast agent should be performed, followed by endoscopy. Endoscopic stent placement remains the standard therapy of AL in our center. Endoscopic vacuum therapy evolves as it is an interesting alternative therapeutic option and can be combined with stenting in selected cases.

摘要

背景

目前关于食管癌食管切除术后吻合口漏(AL)发生的典型时间点的数据稀缺。因此,常规放射造影剂检查(RRCS)用于检测食管切除术后吻合口愈合情况的实用性仍不明确。此外,诊断术后AL的首选可用工具和治疗选择仍存在争议。

方法

我们对2005年至2015年间连续328例行食管癌食管切除术的患者进行了回顾性分析。迄今为止,我们中心在术后第5天(POD),即恢复正常经口进食前进行了RRCS。

结果

328例患者中共有49例(15%)在食管切除术后发生AL。共有11例患者(23%)在RRCS前发生AL,34例患者(69%)在RRCS无异常后发生AL;4例(8%)发生AL的患者通过RRCS确诊,总体敏感性为16%。AL发生的中位时间点为POD 9,大多数AL(84%)发生在POD 1至19之间。计算机断层扫描在41%的患者中诊断出AL。AL最常见的治疗方法是47%的患者进行支架置入。4例患者使用了内镜下真空治疗。

结论

大多数AL发生在食管切除术后的前三周内,没有典型的时间点。在我们的系列研究中,POD 5的RRCS敏感性较低,为16%。因此,一般不建议进行标准化RRCS以及检查前禁食。如果临床怀疑有AL,应进行口服造影剂的胸部和腹部计算机断层扫描,随后进行内镜检查。内镜支架置入仍然是我们中心AL的标准治疗方法。内镜下真空治疗正在发展,因为它是一种有趣的替代治疗选择,并且在某些情况下可以与支架置入联合使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验