• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化主动监测策略,平衡早期发现分级进展和最小化活检危害的竞争目标。

Optimizing active surveillance strategies to balance the competing goals of early detection of grade progression and minimizing harm from biopsies.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):698-705. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31101. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.31101
PMID:29131319
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer includes follow-up with serial prostate biopsies. The optimal biopsy frequency during follow-up has not been determined. The goal of this investigation was to use longitudinal AS biopsy data to assess whether the frequency of biopsy could be reduced without substantially prolonging the time to the detection of disease with a Gleason score ≥ 7.

METHODS

With data from 1375 men with low-risk prostate cancer enrolled in AS at Johns Hopkins, a hidden Markov model was developed to estimate the probability of undersampling at diagnosis, the annual probability of grade progression, and the 10-year cumulative probability of reclassification or progression to Gleason score ≥ 7. It simulated 1024 potential AS biopsy strategies for the 10 years after diagnosis. For each of these strategies, the model predicted the mean delay in the detection of disease with a Gleason score ≥ 7.

RESULTS

The model estimated the 10-year cumulative probability of reclassification from a Gleason score of 6 to a Gleason score ≥ 7 to be 40.0%. The probability of undersampling at diagnosis was 9.8%, and the annual progression probability for men with a Gleason score of 6 was 4.0%. On the basis of these estimates, a simulation of an annual biopsy strategy estimated the mean time to the detection of disease with a Gleason score ≥ 7 to be 14.1 months; however, several strategies eliminated biopsies with only small delays (<12 months) in detecting grade progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Although annual biopsy for low-risk men on AS is associated with the shortest time to the detection of disease with a Gleason score ≥ 7, several alternative strategies may allow less frequent biopsying without sizable delays in detecting grade progression. Cancer 2018;124:698-705. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌的主动监测(AS)包括通过连续前列腺活检进行随访。在随访期间,最佳的活检频率尚未确定。本研究的目的是使用纵向 AS 活检数据来评估是否可以减少活检频率,而不会显著延长发现 Gleason 评分≥7 的疾病的时间。

方法

使用约翰霍普金斯大学 1375 名低危前列腺癌患者的 AS 数据,开发了一个隐马尔可夫模型来估计诊断时抽样不足的概率、每年分级进展的概率以及 10 年内重新分类或进展为 Gleason 评分≥7 的 10 年累积概率。它模拟了诊断后 10 年内 1024 种潜在的 AS 活检策略。对于这些策略中的每一种,该模型预测了 Gleason 评分≥7 的疾病检出延迟的平均时间。

结果

该模型估计 Gleason 评分从 6 分到 Gleason 评分≥7 分的 10 年累积重新分类概率为 40.0%。诊断时抽样不足的概率为 9.8%,Gleason 评分 6 分的男性每年进展的概率为 4.0%。基于这些估计,对每年一次活检策略的模拟估计,发现 Gleason 评分≥7 的疾病检出时间的平均时间为 14.1 个月;然而,一些策略在检测分级进展方面仅延迟较小(<12 个月),从而消除了活检。

结论

尽管 AS 低危男性每年一次的活检与发现 Gleason 评分≥7 的疾病的时间最短,但几种替代策略可能允许较少的活检频率,而不会显著延迟检测分级进展。癌症 2018;124:698-705. © 2017 美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Optimizing active surveillance strategies to balance the competing goals of early detection of grade progression and minimizing harm from biopsies.优化主动监测策略,平衡早期发现分级进展和最小化活检危害的竞争目标。
Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):698-705. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31101. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
2
Simple Risk Stratification to Detect Prostate Cancer with High Gleason Score in Repeat Biopsies in a Population Screening Follow-up Study.在一项人群筛查随访研究中,用于在重复活检中检测高Gleason评分前列腺癌的简单风险分层
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):5031-6.
3
Comparison of biopsy under-sampling and annual progression using hidden markov models to learn from prostate cancer active surveillance studies.使用隐马尔可夫模型对前列腺癌主动监测研究进行学习,比较活检样本不足和年度进展情况。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(24):9611-9619. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3549. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
4
Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.在前列腺癌主动监测期间预测活检结果:Canary 前列腺主动监测研究风险计算器在五个大型主动监测队列中的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.041. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
5
Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.四种前列腺癌主动监测队列中活检升级的对比分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 2;168(1):1-9. doi: 10.7326/M17-0548. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
Active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in the setting of active treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with 5α-reductase inhibitors.在使用 5α-还原酶抑制剂积极治疗良性前列腺增生症的情况下,对极低风险前列腺癌进行主动监测。
Urology. 2013 May;81(5):979-84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.089. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
7
Benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening - predictions of the ONCOTYROL prostate cancer outcome and policy model.前列腺癌筛查的益处与危害——ONCOTYROL前列腺癌结局与政策模型的预测
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4439-9.
8
Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原密度的风险分层,可能会减少接受低风险前列腺癌主动监测的男性不必要的后续活检程序。
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.在前列腺癌主动监测期间进行常规移行区活检可能有助于提高病理进展的检出率。
J Urol. 2014 Oct;192(4):1088-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
10
Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.北美主动监测队列中不同活检频率下的前列腺癌死亡率和转移率。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):583-592. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32557. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reclassification of prostate cancer on first confirmatory prostate biopsy in men under active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接受主动监测的男性首次确诊前列腺活检时前列腺癌的重新分类:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):125-136. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0011. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Prospective Implementation and Early Outcomes of a Risk-stratified Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Follow-up Protocol.风险分层前列腺癌主动监测随访方案的前瞻性实施与早期结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jan 24;49:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.013. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Comparison of biopsy under-sampling and annual progression using hidden markov models to learn from prostate cancer active surveillance studies.
使用隐马尔可夫模型对前列腺癌主动监测研究进行学习,比较活检样本不足和年度进展情况。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(24):9611-9619. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3549. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
4
Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.北美主动监测队列中不同活检频率下的前列腺癌死亡率和转移率。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):583-592. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32557. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Active surveillance: a review of risk-based, dynamic monitoring.主动监测:基于风险的动态监测综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):106-115. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.27.