Suppr超能文献

对头颈部癌症患者术前放置胃造口管实现医疗成本节约的潜力。

Potential for health care cost savings with preoperative gastrostomy tube placement in the head and neck cancer population.

作者信息

Mays Ashley C, Bartels Harrison G, Wistermayer Paul R, Rohlfing Matt L, Gentile Christopher M, D'Agostino Ralph, Waltonen Joshua D

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2018 Jan;40(1):111-119. doi: 10.1002/hed.24992. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the cost differences between preoperative and postoperative placement of gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) in patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with aerodigestive tract cancers from 2010 to 2015. Data included inpatient and postdischarge costs, demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical treatment, length of stay (LOS), time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU), and readmissions.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety patients were included in this study. There was a $7624 inpatient cost savings (P = .002) for those G-tubes placed preoperatively ($26 060) versus postoperatively ($33 754). Postdischarge costs did not differ significantly between groups (P = .60). There was a $9248 total costs savings (P = .009) for those patients with G-tubes placed preoperatively ($39 751) versus postoperatively ($48 999), despite patients with preoperative G-tubes having lower body mass index (BMI; P = .009), higher Association of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class (P = .02), more preoperative radiation (P < .001), and more free tissue transfer reconstruction (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

There is potential for savings by placing G-tubes preoperatively, possibly driven by decreased LOS, despite data suggesting that patients with G-tubes placed preoperatively are higher risk.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是探讨头颈部癌患者术前与术后放置胃造口管(G管)的成本差异。

方法

我们对2010年至2015年患有气消化道癌症的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。数据包括住院和出院后的费用、人口统计学、肿瘤特征、手术治疗、住院时间(LOS)、在重症监护病房(ICU)花费的时间以及再入院情况。

结果

本研究纳入了590名患者。术前放置G管的患者住院费用节省了7624美元(P = 0.002),术前为26060美元,术后为33754美元。两组出院后的费用没有显著差异(P = 0.60)。术前放置G管的患者(39751美元)与术后放置G管的患者(48999美元)相比,总成本节省了9248美元(P = 0.009),尽管术前放置G管的患者体重指数(BMI)较低(P = 0.009)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级较高(P = 0.02)、术前接受放疗更多(P < 0.001)以及接受游离组织转移重建更多(P = 0.007)。

结论

术前放置G管有可能节省费用,这可能是由于住院时间缩短所致,尽管数据表明术前放置G管的患者风险更高。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
The changing landscape of total laryngectomy surgery.喉全切除术手术方式的变迁。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Mar;150(3):413-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599813514515. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
9
Risk factors for unplanned hospital readmission in otolaryngology patients.耳鼻喉科患者非计划性住院再入院的风险因素。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Oct;149(4):562-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599813500023. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验