Harris Tim, Davenport Ross, Mak Matthew, Brohi Karim
Emergency Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018 Feb;36(1):85-106. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.009.
This review summarizes the evolution of trauma resuscitation from a one-size-fits-all approach to one tailored to patient physiology. The most dramatic change is in the management of actively bleeding patients, with a balanced blood product-based resuscitation approach (avoiding crystalloids) and surgery focused on hemorrhage control, not definitive care. When hemostasis has been achieved, definitive resuscitation to restore organ perfusion is initiated. This approach is associated with decreased mortality, reduced duration of stay, improved coagulation profile, and reduced crystalloid/vasopressor use. This article focuses on the tools and methods used for trauma resuscitation in the acute phase of trauma care.
本综述总结了创伤复苏从一刀切方法到根据患者生理状况量身定制方法的演变。最显著的变化在于对活动性出血患者的管理,采用基于平衡血液制品的复苏方法(避免使用晶体液),手术重点在于控制出血,而非确定性治疗。当实现止血后,开始进行确定性复苏以恢复器官灌注。这种方法与死亡率降低、住院时间缩短、凝血指标改善以及晶体液/血管升压药使用减少相关。本文重点关注创伤护理急性期用于创伤复苏的工具和方法。