Surgical exploration for impalpable testis: Which should be first, inguinal exploration or laparoscopic abdominal exploration?

PURPOSE

To discuss an optimal surgical approach for impalpable testis in children, our own treatment results and those reported in the literature were reviewed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-two impalpable testes were diagnosed in 68 patients: unilateral in 64 patients and bilateral in 4 patients. All patients underwent surgical exploration at the ages of 6 to 140months (median, 15months). The inguinal canal was initially explored, and abdominal exploration was performed with laparoscopy when an extra-abdominal testis was not identified. In addition, articles regarding surgical exploration for impalpable testis, published over the last 20years, were retrieved and the results were examined.

RESULTS

Testes were detected by inguinal exploration in 28 of 72 (39%) impalpable testes: intracanalicular in 22 testes and at the internal inguinal ring (peeping or low abdominal testis) in 6 testes. All these testes were treated by conventional inguinal orchidopexy. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in 44 (61%) impalpable testes, and 4 (5.6%) high abdominal testes were detected and treated by two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy. Vanishing or absent testis was the final diagnosis in the remaining 40 testes (55.6%). The literature review showed that the ratios of intra- and extra-abdominal testes were lower in the articles that reported the results of inguinal or scrotal exploration than in those of laparoscopic exploration, although the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the relatively low incidence of high abdominal testis, we recommend to start with inguinal exploration for impalpable testis. When an extra-abdominal testis is not detected, transinguinal laparoscopic exploration should be indicated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, Level IV.