• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索印第安纳州慢性疼痛患者对州处方类阿片政策变化的看法和体验:一项定性研究。

Exploring perceptions and experiences of patients who have chronic pain as state prescription opioid policies change: a qualitative study in Indiana.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e015083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015083.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015083
PMID:29133312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5695446/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The misuse and abuse of prescription opioids (POs) is an epidemic in the USA today. Many states have implemented legislation to curb the use of POs resulting from inappropriate prescribing. Indiana legislated opioid prescribing rules that went into effect in December 2013. The rules changed how chronic pain is managed by healthcare providers. This qualitative study aims to evaluate the impact of Indiana's opioid prescription legislation on the patient experiences around pain management.

SETTING

This is a qualitative study using interviews of patient and primary care providers to obtain triangulated data sources. The patients were recruited from an integrated pain clinic to which chronic pain patients were referred from federally qualified health clinics (FQHCs). The primacy care providers were recruited from the same FQHCs. The study used inductive, emergent thematic analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine patient participants and five primary care providers were included in the study.

RESULTS

Living with chronic pain is disruptive to patients' lives on multiple dimensions. The established pain management practices were disrupted by the change in prescription rules. Patient-provider relationships, which involve power dynamics and decision making, shifted significantly in parallel to the rule change.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of the changes in pain management practice, some patients experienced significant challenges. Further studies into the magnitude of this change are necessary. In addition, exploring methods for regulating prescribing while assuring adequate access to pain management is crucial.

摘要

目的

当今,美国处方类阿片(POs)的滥用现象十分猖獗。为了遏制因处方不当而导致的 POs 使用泛滥,许多州已经实施了相关立法。印第安纳州颁布了自 2013 年 12 月起生效的 PO 处方规定。这些规定改变了医疗保健提供者管理慢性疼痛的方式。本定性研究旨在评估印第安纳州阿片类药物处方立法对患者疼痛管理体验的影响。

背景

这是一项定性研究,通过对患者和初级保健提供者的访谈来获取三角数据来源。患者是从一家综合性疼痛诊所招募的,这些患者是从联邦合格健康诊所(FQHCs)转介过来的。初级保健提供者是从同一 FQHC 招募的。该研究采用了归纳、新兴主题分析。

参与者

该研究共纳入 9 名患者参与者和 5 名初级保健提供者。

结果

慢性疼痛严重影响了患者的生活质量,表现在多个方面。处方规定的改变扰乱了既定的疼痛管理实践。患者与提供者之间的关系,涉及权力动态和决策,与规则的改变平行发生了重大转变。

结论

由于疼痛管理实践的改变,一些患者经历了重大挑战。需要进一步研究这种变化的程度。此外,探索在确保疼痛管理充分获取的同时规范处方的方法至关重要。

相似文献

1
Exploring perceptions and experiences of patients who have chronic pain as state prescription opioid policies change: a qualitative study in Indiana.探索印第安纳州慢性疼痛患者对州处方类阿片政策变化的看法和体验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e015083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015083.
2
The effects of state rules on opioid prescribing in Indiana.印第安纳州的州法规对阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2830-6.
3
Multimodal Local Opioid Prescribing Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Noncancer Pain Management.多模式局部阿片类药物处方干预在慢性非癌性疼痛管理中的效果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):559-566. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180296.
4
Associations between statewide prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) requirement and physician patterns of prescribing opioid analgesics for patients with non-cancer chronic pain.州级处方药物监测计划(PDMP)要求与医生为非癌症慢性疼痛患者开具阿片类镇痛药处方模式之间的关联。
Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
5
[Patterns of prescription of opioid analgesics in Hôtel-Dieu de France of Beyrouth].[贝鲁特法国主宫医院阿片类镇痛药的处方模式]
Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Opioid pharmacovigilance: A clinical-social history of the changes in opioid prescribing for patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use.阿片类药物药物警戒:同时患有慢性非癌痛和物质使用障碍的患者阿片类药物处方变化的临床-社会史。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.043. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Management of Chronic Pain in Adults Living With Sickle Cell Disease in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic: A Qualitative Study.成人镰状细胞病慢性疼痛管理:阿片类药物流行时代的定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4410.
8
When human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment goals conflict with guideline-based opioid prescribing: A qualitative study of HIV treatment providers.当人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)治疗目标与基于指南的阿片类药物处方发生冲突时:对HIV治疗提供者的定性研究。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):148-53. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1129391.
9
Statewide Survey of Healthcare Professionals: Management of Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain.全州医疗保健专业人员调查:慢性非癌性疼痛患者的管理
J Addict Nurs. 2015 Apr-Jun;26(2):86-92. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000075.
10
Diagnosing and managing prescription opioid use disorder in patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain in Australian general practice settings: a qualitative study using the theory of Planned Behaviour.在澳大利亚全科医疗环境中,针对开具阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的患者,使用计划行为理论对处方阿片类药物使用障碍进行诊断和管理:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 3;25(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02474-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequities in Inpatient Obstetrics Pain Management and Evaluation: Age, Race, Mental Health, and Obesity.住院产妇疼痛管理和评估中的不平等现象:年龄、种族、精神健康和肥胖。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Mar;27(3):538-547. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03602-x. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Association of a State Prescribing Limits Policy with Opioid Prescribing and Long-term Use: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.州处方限制政策与阿片类药物处方和长期使用的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1862-1870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07991-7. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
General practitioners' attitudes towards opioids for non-cancer pain: a qualitative systematic review.全科医生对非癌性疼痛使用阿片类药物的态度:一项定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054945.
4
Opioid Policy and Chronic Pain Treatment Access Experiences: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Analysis and Conceptual Model.阿片类药物政策与慢性疼痛治疗获取体验:多利益相关者定性分析与概念模型
J Pain Res. 2021 Apr 27;14:1161-1169. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S282228. eCollection 2021.
5
The Importance of Perceived Relevance: A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient's Perceptions of Value and Impact Following a Low-Intensity Group-Based Pain Management Program.感知相关性的重要性:一项定性评估患者在参加低强度团体为基础的疼痛管理项目后的价值和影响的认知。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 7;57(1):46. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010046.
6
Considerations for Cannabis Use to Treat Pain in Sickle Cell Disease.关于使用大麻治疗镰状细胞病疼痛的考量
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 1;9(12):3902. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123902.
7
Experiences of people taking opioid medication for chronic non-malignant pain: a qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography.慢性非恶性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物的体验:使用荟萃元分析的定性证据综合
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e032988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032988.
8
The Association of State Opioid Misuse Prevention Policies With Patient- and Provider-Related Outcomes: A Scoping Review.州级阿片类药物滥用预防政策与患者和医疗服务提供者相关结局的关联:范围综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):57-105. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12436. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
9
Taking opioids in times of crisis: Institutional oversight, chronic pain and suffering in an integrated healthcare delivery system in the U.S.在危机时刻使用阿片类药物:美国整合医疗服务体系中的制度监督、慢性疼痛和痛苦
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of state rules on opioid prescribing in Indiana.印第安纳州的州法规对阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2830-6.
2
Gender and prescription opioid misuse in the emergency department.急诊科中的性别与处方阿片类药物滥用
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1493-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12547.
3
Harms of prescription opioid use in the United States.美国处方阿片类药物使用的危害。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Oct 27;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-43.
4
Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a position paper of the American Academy of Neurology.用于慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物:美国神经病学学会立场声明
Neurology. 2014 Sep 30;83(14):1277-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000839.
5
Decline in drug overdose deaths after state policy changes - Florida, 2010-2012.州政策变化后药物过量死亡人数下降-佛罗里达州,2010-2012 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Jul 4;63(26):569-74.
6
Vital signs: variation among States in prescribing of opioid pain relievers and benzodiazepines - United States, 2012.生命体征:2012 年美国各州阿片类止痛药和苯二氮䓬类药物处方差异。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Jul 4;63(26):563-8.
7
Pills, policies, and predicaments: the unintended consequences of a health care system's policy toward opioids.药丸、政策与困境:医疗保健系统对阿片类药物政策的意外后果。
Pain Med. 2013 Oct;14(10):1439-40. doi: 10.1111/pme.12271.
8
Racial differences in prescription of opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in a national sample of veterans.全国退伍军人样本中慢性非癌性疼痛患者使用阿片类镇痛药的种族差异。
J Pain. 2014 Apr;15(4):447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
9
State laws regulating prescribing of controlled substances: balancing the public health problems of chronic pain and prescription painkiller abuse and overdose.州级法律对管制类物质处方的监管:平衡慢性疼痛和处方类止痛药滥用及用药过量的公共健康问题。
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Mar;41 Suppl 1:42-5. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12037.
10
Prescription drug abuse: problem, policies, and implications.处方药物滥用:问题、政策与影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2013 Mar-Apr;61(2):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Dec 12.