Suppr超能文献

2017 年 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA 高血压防治、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告

Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e116-e135. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000067. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature systematically and perform meta-analyses to address these questions: 1) Is there evidence that self-measured blood pressure (BP) without other augmentation is superior to office-based measurement of BP for achieving better BP control or for preventing adverse clinical outcomes that are related to elevated BP? 2) What is the optimal target for BP lowering during antihypertensive therapy in adults? 3) In adults with hypertension, how do various antihypertensive drug classes differ in their benefits and harms compared with each other as first-line therapy?

METHODS

Electronic literature searches were performed by Doctor Evidence, a global medical evidence software and services company, across PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to 2015 using key words and relevant subject headings for randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criteria defined for each question. We performed analyses using traditional frequentist statistical and Bayesian approaches, including random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Our results suggest that: 1) There is a modest but significant improvement in systolic BP in randomized controlled trials of self-measured BP versus usual care at 6 but not 12 months, and for selected patients and their providers self-measured BP may be a helpful adjunct to routine office care. 2) systolic BP lowering to a target of <130 mm Hg may reduce the risk of several important outcomes including risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and major cardiovascular events. No class of medications (ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or beta blockers) was significantly better than thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics as a first-line therapy for any outcome.

摘要

目的

系统地回顾文献并进行荟萃分析,以回答以下问题:1)自我测量血压(BP)而不进行其他增强是否比基于诊室的 BP 测量更能更好地控制 BP 或预防与升高的 BP 相关的不良临床结局?2)在降压治疗中,成年人的 BP 降低的最佳目标是什么?3)在患有高血压的成年人中,与其他降压药物相比,各种降压药物类别在一线治疗中彼此之间的获益和危害有何不同?

方法

全球医学证据软件和服务公司 Doctor Evidence 通过电子文献搜索,在 1966 年至 2015 年期间,使用关键词和相关主题词在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 上对符合每个问题定义的入选标准的随机对照试验进行了搜索。我们使用传统的频率论统计和贝叶斯方法进行了分析,包括随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

结果

我们的结果表明:1)与常规护理相比,自我测量 BP 的随机对照试验在 6 个月而非 12 个月时收缩压有适度但显著的改善,对于某些患者及其提供者,自我测量 BP 可能是常规诊室护理的有益辅助手段。2)收缩压降低至<130mmHg 的目标可能会降低多种重要结局的风险,包括心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭和主要心血管事件的风险。与噻嗪类利尿剂相比,没有任何一类药物(即血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂或β受体阻滞剂)在任何结局上都作为一线治疗更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验