Suppr超能文献

2017 年 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA 高血压防治、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告

Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

机构信息

These members of the evidence review committee are listed alphabetically, and all participated equally in the process. †The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

出版信息

Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):e595-e616. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000601.

Abstract

Objective To review the literature systematically and perform meta-analyses to address these questions: 1) Is there evidence that self-measured blood pressure (BP) without other augmentation is superior to office-based measurement of BP for achieving better BP control or for preventing adverse clinical outcomes that are related to elevated BP? 2) What is the optimal target for BP lowering during antihypertensive therapy in adults? 3) In adults with hypertension, how do various antihypertensive drug classes differ in their benefits and harms compared with each other as first-line therapy? Methods Electronic literature searches were performed by Doctor Evidence, a global medical evidence software and services company, across PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to 2015 using key words and relevant subject headings for randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criteria defined for each question. We performed analyses using traditional frequentist statistical and Bayesian approaches, including random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results Our results suggest that: 1) There is a modest but significant improvement in systolic BP in randomized controlled trials of self-measured BP versus usual care at 6 but not 12 months, and for selected patients and their providers self-measured BP may be a helpful adjunct to routine office care. 2) systolic BP lowering to a target of <130 mm Hg may reduce the risk of several important outcomes including risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and major cardiovascular events. No class of medications (ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or beta blockers) was significantly better than thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics as a first-line therapy for any outcome.

摘要

目的

系统回顾文献并进行荟萃分析,以解答以下问题:1)在实现更好的血压控制或预防与血压升高相关的不良临床结局方面,自我测量血压(BP)而不进行其他增强与在诊室内测量 BP 相比,是否有证据表明前者更优?2)在降压治疗中,成人的血压降低的最佳目标是什么?3)在高血压成人中,与其他降压药物类别相比,各种降压药物类别作为一线治疗时,其获益和危害有何不同?方法:全球医学证据软件和服务公司 Doctor Evidence 通过电子文献检索,在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 上检索了 1966 年至 2015 年的文献,使用了随机对照试验的关键词和相关主题词,这些试验符合为每个问题定义的入选标准。我们使用传统的频率论统计和贝叶斯方法进行了分析,包括随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。结果:我们的结果表明:1)与常规护理相比,自我测量 BP 与常规护理相比,在随机对照试验中,6 个月而非 12 个月时收缩压有适度但显著的改善,对于某些患者及其提供者,自我测量 BP 可能是常规诊室护理的有益辅助手段。2)收缩压降低到<130mmHg 的目标可能会降低几种重要结局的风险,包括心肌梗死、卒中和心力衰竭的风险以及主要心血管事件的风险。没有一类药物(即血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂或β受体阻滞剂)作为一线治疗任何结局均明显优于噻嗪类和噻嗪样利尿剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验