• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西公立医院压力性尿失禁手术治疗的成本分析,比较经耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术(Burch 术)和合成吊带术。

Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.

机构信息

Serviço de Ginecologia do Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jan-Feb;44(1):109-113. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0232.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0232
PMID:29135411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5815540/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence progressed significantly with the introduction of synthetic slings. However, in some public Brazilian hospitals, the costs of these materials prevent their routine use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs of ambulatory synthetic sling surgery with an historical series of patients submitted to Burch surgery in a Brazilian public hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty nine incontinent patients were selected to synthetic sling surgery. Demographic data were prospectively collected and also the costs of the procedure, including drugs and materials, use of surgical and recovery wards, medical staff and hospitalization. These data were compared to the costs of 29 Burch surgeries performed before the introduction of synthetic slings.

RESULTS

Demographic data were similar, although median age was lower in the group submitted to Burch surgery (46.3±8.6 versus 56.2±11.3 (p<0.001)). Cost was significantly lower in patients submitted to sling in all items, except for time spent in recovery ward. Total value of 29 Burch surgeries was R$ 217.766.12, and of R$ 68.049.92 of 29 patients submitted to sling surgery (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Burch surgery was more expensive than ambulatory synthetic transobturator sling surgery, even when the cost of the synthetic sling was considered.

摘要

引言

随着合成吊带的引入,尿失禁的手术治疗取得了显著进展。然而,在一些巴西公立医院,这些材料的成本使其无法常规使用。

目的

比较巴西公立医院门诊使用合成吊带手术与历史系列患者行 Burch 手术的成本。

材料与方法

选择 29 例尿失禁患者行合成吊带手术。前瞻性收集人口统计学数据,包括手术费用、药物和材料费用、手术和恢复病房使用、医务人员和住院费用。将这些数据与在引入合成吊带之前进行的 29 例 Burch 手术的成本进行比较。

结果

人口统计学数据相似,但接受 Burch 手术的患者组的中位年龄较低(46.3±8.6 岁 vs. 56.2±11.3 岁(p<0.001))。除恢复病房的停留时间外,接受吊带手术的患者在所有项目的成本均显著降低。29 例 Burch 手术的总费用为 217766.12 雷亚尔,29 例接受吊带手术的患者的费用为 68049.92 雷亚尔(p<0.001)。

结论

即使考虑合成吊带的成本,Burch 手术也比门诊使用合成经闭孔吊带手术更昂贵。

相似文献

1
Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.巴西公立医院压力性尿失禁手术治疗的成本分析,比较经耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术(Burch 术)和合成吊带术。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jan-Feb;44(1):109-113. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0232.
2
Cost comparison of the laparoscopic burch colposuspension, laparoscopic two-team sling procedure, and the transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.腹腔镜Burch阴道悬吊术、腹腔镜双组吊带手术及经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的成本比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30997-X.
3
Economic considerations for mid-urethral sling procedures among patients with stress urinary incontinence.压力性尿失禁患者中尿道吊带手术的经济考量
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2013;23(1):1-8. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2013007760.
4
Impact of the availability of midurethral slings on treatment strategies for stress urinary incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中尿道吊带可用性对压力性尿失禁治疗策略的影响:成本效益分析。
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):500-508. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16850. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after burch and sling procedures.经Burch手术和吊带手术后复发性压力性尿失禁的管理
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Mar;35(3):344-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22714. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
6
Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.术前常规尿动力学检查无法预测Burch阴道悬吊术与耻骨后阴道吊带术相比后发生的排尿功能障碍。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):2076-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
7
Treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using suburethral slings: comparative, retrospective, observational study of two surgical techniques.使用尿道下吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁:两种手术技术的比较、回顾性观察研究
Actas Urol Esp. 2013 Oct;37(9):549-53. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
8
[Analysis of the results of urinary incontinence treatment in women using free suburethral synthetic sling: the experience of 1000 operations].[使用游离尿道下合成吊带治疗女性尿失禁的结果分析:1000例手术经验]
Urologiia. 2013 Jul-Aug(4):5-11.
9
Long-Term Results of Burch and Autologous Sling Procedures for Stress Urinary Incontinence in E-SISTEr Participants at 1 Site.单点 E-SISTEr 参与者中压力性尿失禁行 Burch 和自体吊带手术的长期结果。
J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1224-1229. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000421. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
10
Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension.压力性尿失禁手术后的性功能:阴道吊带术与Burch阴道悬吊术对比
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Jan;277(1):31-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0418-1. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Public-private settlement and hospital mortality per sources of payment.公私合营结算与按支付来源划分的医院死亡率
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Jul 21;50. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006330.
2
Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A FIGO working group report.压力性尿失禁的评估与手术:国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)工作组报告
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Feb;36(2):518-528. doi: 10.1002/nau.22960. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
3
[Use and sources of medicines: a population-based study in Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil].[药物的使用与来源:巴西圣保罗州坎皮纳斯市基于人群的研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2016 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00067814. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Effect of anesthesia type on perioperative outcomes with a midurethral sling.麻醉类型对经尿道中段吊带术围手术期结局的影响
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1327-32. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2950-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Economic analyses of stress urinary incontinence surgical procedures in women.女性压力性尿失禁外科手术的经济学分析
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):1040-1045. doi: 10.1002/nau.22878. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA.美国女性压力性尿失禁中经阴道无张力吊带术与耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术的成本效果分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E151-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12180. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries, 2002-2007.2002-2007 年间,女性 Medicare 受益人群中压力性尿失禁的手术治疗趋势。
Urology. 2013 Jul;82(1):38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.087. Epub 2013 May 21.
8
Cost comparison of the laparoscopic burch colposuspension, laparoscopic two-team sling procedure, and the transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.腹腔镜Burch阴道悬吊术、腹腔镜双组吊带手术及经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的成本比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30997-X.
9
Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence.经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术(TOT)与Burch手术治疗压力性尿失禁的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;31(6):518-20. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2011.578776.
10
A three year follow-up of a prospective open randomized trial to compare tension-free vaginal tape with Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.一项前瞻性开放性随机试验的三年随访,该试验比较无张力阴道吊带术与Burch阴道悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的效果。
Actas Urol Esp. 2009 Nov;33(10):1088-96.