• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国女性压力性尿失禁中经阴道无张力吊带术与耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E151-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12180. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1111/bju.12180
PMID:23773373
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness (CE) of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) with that of burch colposuspension (BC) for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Markov-chain decision model was created to simulate treatment of SUI with TVT or BC using Treeage Pro 2011 software (Treeage Software Inc., Williamstown, MA, USA). Costing data were obtained from the Medicare Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. Data regarding the success of TVT vs BC were obtained from the peer-reviewed literature, as were corresponding utilities for different continence states. The CE of each procedure was calculated and compared, and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At 10-year follow-up, TVT was more cost-effective (CE = $1495/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) than BC (CE = $1824/QALY). Sensitivity analysis showed that TVT was more cost-effective than BC if the cost of the TVT device was <$3220. If the probability of success after TVT was <42%, then BC became the more cost-effective strategy (CE = $1827/QALY).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TVT was more cost-effective than BC as a treatment for female SUI. Both cost of TVT device and efficacy of the procedure affect the CE analysis.

摘要

目的

比较经阴道无张力吊带术(TVT)与耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术(BC)治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的成本效果。

材料与方法

采用 Treeage Pro 2011 软件(美国马萨诸塞州威廉斯敦的 Treeage Software Inc.)创建 Markov 链决策模型,模拟 TVT 或 BC 治疗 SUI。成本数据来自 Medicare 资源基础相对价值量表。TVT 与 BC 成功率的数据来自同行评议文献,不同控尿状态的相应效用值也来自文献。计算并比较了两种手术的成本效果,并进行了敏感性分析。

结果

在 10 年随访时,TVT 的成本效果(CE = $1495/质量调整生命年[QALY])优于 BC(CE = $1824/QALY)。敏感性分析显示,如果 TVT 装置的成本<$3220,则 TVT 比 BC 更具成本效果。如果 TVT 后的成功率<42%,则 BC 成为更具成本效果的策略(CE = $1827/QALY)。

结论

我们的研究表明,TVT 是治疗女性 SUI 更具成本效果的方法。TVT 装置的成本和手术的疗效均会影响成本效果分析。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA.美国女性压力性尿失禁中经阴道无张力吊带术与耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术的成本效果分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E151-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12180. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
2
Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence?与无张力阴道吊带术相比,Burch阴道悬吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁是否具有成本效益?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):62.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.039.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of retropubic midurethral sling versus transobturator midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence.耻骨后尿道中段吊带术与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的成本效益分析
Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Nov;33(8):1186-92. doi: 10.1002/nau.22483. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
4
[Effects of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study].[腹腔镜Burch阴道悬吊术与无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 9;88(45):3192-4.
5
A three year follow-up of a prospective open randomized trial to compare tension-free vaginal tape with Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.一项前瞻性开放性随机试验的三年随访,该试验比较无张力阴道吊带术与Burch阴道悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的效果。
Actas Urol Esp. 2009 Nov;33(10):1088-96.
6
Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence.开放式Burch阴道悬吊术、腹腔镜阴道悬吊术及无张力阴道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的医疗费用比较
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(6):761-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20417.
7
[Clinical study on tension-free vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape obturator for surgical treatment of severe stress urinary incontinence].无张力阴道吊带术及无张力阴道吊带闭孔术治疗重度压力性尿失禁的临床研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Mar;43(3):180-4.
8
Economic analyses of stress urinary incontinence surgical procedures in women.女性压力性尿失禁外科手术的经济学分析
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):1040-1045. doi: 10.1002/nau.22878. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
9
Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency.经阴道无张力吊带术与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁伴固有括约肌缺陷患者的 3 年随访结果比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):321-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823dfc73.
10
Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence.无张力阴道吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(21):iii, 1-189. doi: 10.3310/hta7210.

引用本文的文献

1
COMET (Composite Outcomes of Mesh vs suture Techniques for prolapse repair)- Protocol for a single blind randomized controlled multicenter trial testing surgical innovation in female pelvic surgery.COMET(网片与缝合技术治疗脱垂修复的综合结局)- 一项在女性盆腔手术中测试手术创新的单盲随机对照多中心试验方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0308926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308926. eCollection 2024.
2
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence.女性压力性尿失禁的手术治疗:经济证据的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 20;9(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01352-3.
3
Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.
巴西公立医院压力性尿失禁手术治疗的成本分析,比较经耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术(Burch 术)和合成吊带术。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jan-Feb;44(1):109-113. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0232.
4
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.耻骨后开放式阴道膀胱悬吊术治疗女性尿失禁
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 25;7(7):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub7.