• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用英国初级保健、癌症登记和住院数据验证癌症病例。

Validation of Cancer Cases Using Primary Care, Cancer Registry, and Hospitalization Data in the United Kingdom.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2018 Mar;29(2):308-313. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000786.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000786
PMID:29135571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5794229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the United Kingdom, hospital or cancer registry data can be linked to electronic medical records for a subset of general practices and years.

METHODS

We used Clinical Practice Research Datalink data (2004-2012) from patients treated for overactive bladder. We electronically identified provisional cases of 10 common cancers in General Practitioner Online Database data and validated them by medical profile review. In practices with linkage to Hospital Episodes Statistics and National Cancer Data Repository (2004-2010), we validated provisional cancer cases against these data sources. This linkage also let us identify additional cancer diagnoses in individuals without cancer diagnosis records in the General Practitioner Online Database.

RESULTS

Among 50,840 patients, 1,486 provisional cancer cases were identified in the General Practitioner Online Database for 2004-2012. Medical profile review confirmed 93% of 661 cases in nonlinked practices (range, 100% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and uterine cancer to 77% of skin melanomas) and 96% of 825 cases in linked practices (100% of kidney and uterine cancers to 92% of melanomas). In the subset of linked practices, for 2004-2010, 720 cases were confirmed, of which 68% were identifiable in the General Practitioner Online Database (range, 90% of breast to 36% of kidney cancers).

CONCLUSIONS

Most cases of cancer identified electronically in the General Practitioner Online Database were confirmed. A substantial proportion of cases, especially of cancer types not typically managed by general practitioners, would be missed without Hospital Episodes Statistics and National Cancer Data Repository data (and are likely missed in nonlinked practices). See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B315.

REGISTRATION (BEFORE STUDY CONDUCT): European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorisation Studies (EU PAS Registry) number EUPAS5529, http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=11107.

摘要

背景

在英国,医院或癌症登记处的数据可以与部分普通诊所和年份的电子病历相关联。

方法

我们使用了临床实践研究数据链接(2004-2012 年)中接受过膀胱过度活动症治疗的患者的数据。我们在全科医生在线数据库中电子识别出 10 种常见癌症的暂定病例,并通过医疗档案审查进行验证。在与医院事件统计和国家癌症数据仓库(2004-2010 年)有链接的实践中,我们根据这些数据源验证了暂定癌症病例。这种链接还使我们能够在没有全科医生在线数据库癌症诊断记录的个体中识别出其他癌症诊断。

结果

在 50840 名患者中,2004-2012 年,全科医生在线数据库中确定了 1486 例暂定癌症病例。医疗档案审查证实了非链接实践中 661 例病例的 93%(范围为非霍奇金淋巴瘤和子宫癌的 100%至黑素瘤的 77%)和链接实践中 825 例病例的 96%(肾癌和子宫癌的 100%至黑素瘤的 92%)。在链接实践的子集中,2004-2010 年,有 720 例病例得到确认,其中 68%可在全科医生在线数据库中识别(范围为乳腺癌的 90%至肾癌的 36%)。

结论

在全科医生在线数据库中电子识别的大多数癌症病例得到了证实。如果没有医院事件统计和国家癌症数据仓库的数据(并且很可能在非链接实践中遗漏),将会错过很大一部分病例,尤其是那些通常不由全科医生管理的癌症类型。请观看视频摘要,网址为,http://links.lww.com/EDE/B315。

登记(在研究进行之前):欧盟药品上市后监测研究电子登记册(EU PAS 注册表)编号 EUPAS5529,网址为 http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=11107。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d17/5794229/142505c621a6/ede-29-308-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d17/5794229/142505c621a6/ede-29-308-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d17/5794229/142505c621a6/ede-29-308-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Cancer Cases Using Primary Care, Cancer Registry, and Hospitalization Data in the United Kingdom.利用英国初级保健、癌症登记和住院数据验证癌症病例。
Epidemiology. 2018 Mar;29(2):308-313. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000786.
2
Cancer recording in patients with and without type 2 diabetes in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink primary care data and linked hospital admission data: a cohort study.在临床实践研究数据库初级保健数据和相关住院数据中,记录有 2 型糖尿病和无 2 型糖尿病患者的癌症情况:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 26;8(5):e020827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020827.
3
Reusability of coded data in the primary care electronic medical record: A dynamic cohort study concerning cancer diagnoses.基层医疗电子病历中编码数据的可复用性:一项关于癌症诊断的动态队列研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Mar;99:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
4
Data linkage errors in hospital administrative data when applying a pseudonymisation algorithm to paediatric intensive care records.将假名化算法应用于儿科重症监护记录时医院管理数据中的数据链接错误。
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 21;5(8):e008118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008118.
5
Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries.全科医学研究数据库及相关癌症登记处中的癌症记录和死亡率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):168-75. doi: 10.1002/pds.3374. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
6
Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.在英格兰,与癌症登记处关联的初级保健数据库中癌症诊断的有效性。基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
7
Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.《2012年意大利癌症数据报告:儿童和青少年癌症》
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1 Suppl 1):1-225.
8
Do GPs know their patients with cancer? Assessing the quality of cancer registration in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional validation study.全科医生了解他们的癌症患者吗?评估荷兰初级保健中癌症登记的质量:一项横断面验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e012669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012669.
9
Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.在澳大利亚医疗服务利用数据库中识别结直肠癌和肺癌新发病例:一项验证研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0417-5.
10
Approach to record linkage of primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink to other health-related patient data: overview and implications.临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)初级保健数据与其他健康相关患者数据的记录链接方法:概述及意义。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;34(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0442-4. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and survival outcomes for liposarcoma patients in England: An observational cohort study using real world data.英国脂肪肉瘤患者的流行病学和生存结果:一项使用真实世界数据的观察性队列研究。
Rare Tumors. 2025 Jul 26;17:20363613251346621. doi: 10.1177/20363613251346621. eCollection 2025.
2
Mortality Risks of U.S. Healthcare Workers.美国医护人员的死亡风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun;68(6):1080-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
During the COVID-19 pandemic 20 000 prostate cancer diagnoses were missed in England.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Incidence after Initiation of Antimuscarinic Medications for Overactive Bladder in the United Kingdom: Evidence for Protopathic Bias.英国启动抗毒蕈碱药物治疗膀胱过度活动症后的癌症发病率:原发病性偏倚的证据。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Jun;37(6):673-683. doi: 10.1002/phar.1932. Epub 2017 May 29.
2
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
3
The identification of incident cancers in UK primary care databases: a systematic review.
在新冠疫情期间,英国有20000例前列腺癌诊断被漏诊。
BJU Int. 2024 May;133(5):587-595. doi: 10.1111/bju.16305. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
4
Development and Validation of Case-Finding Algorithms for Digestive Cancer in the Spanish Healthcare Database BIFAP.西班牙医疗数据库BIFAP中消化系统癌症病例发现算法的开发与验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 9;13(2):361. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020361.
5
Presence of Breast Cancer Information Recorded in United Kingdom Primary Care Databases: Comparison of CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD (Companion Paper 1).英国初级医疗数据库中记录的乳腺癌信息情况:CPRD Aurum与CPRD GOLD的比较(配套论文1)
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1183-1192. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434795. eCollection 2023.
6
Correctness and Completeness of Breast Cancer Diagnoses Recorded in UK CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD Databases: Comparison to Hospital Episode Statistics and Cancer Registry (Companion Paper 2).英国CPRD Aurum和CPRD GOLD数据库中记录的乳腺癌诊断的准确性和完整性:与医院事件统计和癌症登记处的比较(配套论文2)
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 16;15:1193-1206. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S434829. eCollection 2023.
7
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of skin cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes: a UK population-based cohort study.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病患者皮肤癌风险的关系:一项基于英国人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Nov;11(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003550.
8
Healthcare in England was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic across the pancreatic cancer pathway: A cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP.英格兰的医疗保健在整个胰腺癌治疗路径中都受到了 COVID-19 大流行的影响:一项使用 OpenSAFELY-TPP 的队列研究。
Elife. 2023 Aug 10;12:e85332. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85332.
9
Validation study of case-identifying algorithms for severe hypoglycemia using hospital administrative data in Japan.利用日本医院行政数据验证严重低血糖病例识别算法。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0289840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289840. eCollection 2023.
10
Evaluating Metformin Strategies for Cancer Prevention: A Target Trial Emulation Using Electronic Health Records.评估二甲双胍在癌症预防中的策略:基于电子健康记录的目标试验模拟。
Epidemiology. 2023 Sep 1;34(5):690-699. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001626. Epub 2023 May 23.
英国初级医疗数据库中新发癌症的识别:一项系统综述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):11-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.3729. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
4
Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries.全科医学研究数据库及相关癌症登记处中的癌症记录和死亡率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):168-75. doi: 10.1002/pds.3374. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
5
Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.在英格兰,与癌症登记处关联的初级保健数据库中癌症诊断的有效性。基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 21.