Ward T B, Stagner B H, Scott J G, Marcus-Mendoza S T, Turner D
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jan;45(1):71-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03208035.
Individuals tend to adopt either analytic or holistic modes of categorizing objects. In two studies, we examined the relation between these categorization tendencies and cognitive abilities as measured by standard psychometric instruments. The participants in both studies were pretested with a restricted classification task in which it was possible for them to classify simple stimuli by dimensional identity or overall similarity. Those making a large number of either type of categorization were then tested with subtests of the WAIS-R and with the Raven's progressive matrices. Across both studies, the analytic individuals (many dimensional identity classifications) scored higher than the holistic individuals (many overall similarity classifications) on some but not all of the subtests. The results are consistent with the idea that holistic modes of categorization may be more "primitive" than analytic modes. The findings are discussed in terms of the association between categorization mode and either general or specific cognitive abilities.
个体倾向于采用分析或整体的方式对物体进行分类。在两项研究中,我们考察了这些分类倾向与通过标准心理测量工具所测量的认知能力之间的关系。两项研究的参与者都预先接受了一项受限分类任务的测试,在该任务中,他们有可能根据维度特征或整体相似性对简单刺激进行分类。然后,对那些大量进行任何一种分类的参与者进行韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)的子测验以及瑞文渐进矩阵测验。在两项研究中,分析型个体(大量基于维度特征的分类)在部分而非全部子测验中的得分高于整体型个体(大量基于整体相似性的分类)。这些结果与整体分类模式可能比分析分类模式更“原始”这一观点相一致。我们从分类模式与一般或特定认知能力之间的关联角度对这些发现进行了讨论。