• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年幼儿童和智障儿童的分类:整体相似关系的首要性。

Classification in young and retarded children: the primacy of overall similarity relations.

作者信息

Kemler D G

出版信息

Child Dev. 1982 Jun;53(3):768-79.

PMID:7094679
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that young normal children use similarity relations as a predominant basis for classification, whereas older children use dimensional relations. Experiment 1 shows that similarity relations are systematically used by normal preschoolers and by retarded preadolescents for classification. Experiment 2 suggests that their tendency to use similarity relations is not merely a matter of preference, but that these children have difficulty learning to use dimensional relations. Still, experiment 3 demonstrates that dimensional relations have some psychological reality for preschoolers and for retarded children despite the dominance of overall similarity and despite the relative inaccessibility of dimensional relations. The research affords a finer specification of the development of classification skills and highlights the relation between intelligence and psychological stimulus structure.

摘要

先前的研究表明,正常的幼儿将相似关系作为分类的主要依据,而年龄较大的儿童则使用维度关系。实验1表明,正常的学龄前儿童和发育迟缓的青春期前儿童在分类时会系统地使用相似关系。实验2表明,他们使用相似关系的倾向不仅仅是一种偏好,而是这些儿童在学习使用维度关系时存在困难。尽管如此,实验3表明,尽管整体相似性占主导地位,且维度关系相对难以理解,但维度关系对学龄前儿童和发育迟缓儿童来说仍具有一定的心理现实意义。这项研究对分类技能的发展进行了更细致的说明,并突出了智力与心理刺激结构之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Classification in young and retarded children: the primacy of overall similarity relations.年幼儿童和智障儿童的分类:整体相似关系的首要性。
Child Dev. 1982 Jun;53(3):768-79.
2
Relationship of perceived stimulus structure and intelligence: further tests of a separability hypothesis.感知刺激结构与智力的关系:可分离性假设的进一步检验。
Am J Ment Defic. 1986 Sep;91(2):196-200.
3
Perceptual development and category generalization.感知发展与类别归纳
Child Dev. 1979 Sep;50(3):705-15.
4
Equivalence formation by mentally retarded and nonretarded children using pictorial and printed word stimulus items.智力迟钝儿童和非智力迟钝儿童使用图片和印刷文字刺激项目形成等价物。
Am J Ment Defic. 1971 Sep;76(2):252-6.
5
Visual discrimination learning in familial retarded and nonretarded children.家族性智力迟钝和非智力迟钝儿童的视觉辨别学习
Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Jul;78(1):63-9.
6
Haptic-visual shape matching by mentally retarded children: exploratory activity and complexity effects.智障儿童的触觉-视觉形状匹配:探索性活动与复杂性效应
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Mar;84(5):526-33.
7
Performance of retarded children on a liquid conservation task: protocol objectivity and visual screening.智障儿童在液体守恒任务中的表现:程序客观性与视觉筛查
Am J Ment Defic. 1972 May;76(6):729-32.
8
Discrimination learning in retarded and nonretarded children as a function of task difficulty and social reinforcement.智力迟钝儿童和非智力迟钝儿童的辨别学习与任务难度及社会强化的关系
Am J Ment Defic. 1971 Nov;76(3):275-83.
9
Performance of MA-matched nonretarded and retarded children on discrimination learning and transfer-shift tasks.心理年龄匹配的非智力迟钝和智力迟钝儿童在辨别学习和迁移转换任务中的表现。
Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Nov;83(3):262-9.
10
Development of conceptual knowledge in children with mental retardation.智力发育迟缓儿童概念知识的发展。
Am J Ment Retard. 1993 Sep;98(2):293-303.

引用本文的文献

1
The time course of explicit and implicit categorization.显性和隐性分类的时间进程。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2476-90. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0933-2.
2
Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.内隐和外显分类:四种物种的故事。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
3
Selective attention and attention switching: towards a unified developmental approach.选择性注意和注意转换:走向统一的发展方法。
Dev Sci. 2010 Jul;13(4):622-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00921.x.
4
Rules and resemblance: their changing balance in the category learning of humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).规则与相似性:它们在人类(智人)和猴子(猕猴)类别学习中不断变化的平衡。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):172-83. doi: 10.1037/a0016748.
5
Does language about similarity play a role in fostering similarity comparison in children?关于相似性的语言在促进儿童进行相似性比较方面是否发挥作用?
Cognition. 2009 Aug;112(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
6
Individual differences in processing stimulus dimensions: relation to selective processing abilities.
Percept Psychophys. 1985 May;37(5):471-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03202880.
7
The influence of alcohol and loud music on analytic and holistic processing.
Percept Psychophys. 1987 Feb;41(2):179-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03204879.
8
Classification behavior and measures of intelligence: dimensional identity versus overall similarity.智力的分类行为与测量:维度同一性与整体相似性
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jan;45(1):71-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03208035.