Angtuaco T L, Boyd C M, London S N, Powell L G, Diner W C, Vandergrift J F, Bersey M L, Bass B M, Donovan S A
Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205.
Radiographics. 1989 Jan;9(1):115-28. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.9.1.2913615.
Thirteen infertile women who had undergone tubal surgery within the previous year for the correction of tubal obstruction, were studied with both conventional and radionuclide hysterosalpingography. The studies were performed on the same day, were interpreted independently, and the results were then compared. Three cases were excluded from analysis because of the technical inadequacy of one of the studies. Assuming the findings of the conventional studies to represent "truth," the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the radionuclide studies were 100%, 60% and 80% respectively.
对13名在前一年接受过输卵管手术以纠正输卵管阻塞的不孕女性，进行了传统子宫输卵管造影术和放射性核素子宫输卵管造影术的研究。两项研究在同一天进行，由不同人员独立解读，然后比较结果。由于其中一项研究技术不达标，3例被排除在分析之外。假设传统研究结果代表“真实情况”，放射性核素研究的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100%、60%和80%。
