• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[低位直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术后会阴切口并发症的预后因素]

[Prognosis factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].

作者信息

Luo S, Liang J W, Zhou H T, Pei W, Zhou Z X, Liu Q, Wang X S

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 1;55(11):842-846. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.11.005.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.11.005
PMID:29136732
Abstract

To evaluate the prognosis factors affecting perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for the low rectal cancer. This was a retrospective analysis of 151 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR between January and December 2013 at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The patients were comprised of 95 males and 56 females. The mean age of the patients was (57.3±10.9) years (ranging from 31 to 79 years). χ(2) test and Logistic regression analysis were used to identify the prognosis factors of perineum incision complications. In all 151 patients, perineal incision complications were confirmed in 31 patients (20.5%), including 8 cases of incision infection, 22 cases of poor healing of perineal wound, and 1 case of incision fistula formation. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with perineal incision complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (χ(2)=7.116, =0.008), intraoperative blood loss (χ(2)=9.157, =0.002), while the protective factors associate with perineal incision complications were the intraperitoneal chemotherapy with fluorouracil sustained release (χ(2)=5.020, =0.025), pelvic restoration (χ(2)=10.158, =0.001), operation experience (χ(2)=7.334, =0.007). The gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, preoperative radiochemtherapy, hemoglobin level, albumin level, distance from distal tumor to anal verge, the procedure of APR, operating time, intraoperative blood transfusion, total drainage volume 3 days after operation, tumor differentiation and the postoperative TNM staging were not associated with perineal incision complications (>0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the intraoperative pelvic restoration (=0.200, 95% 0.045 to 0.894, =0.035) and intraoperative blood loss (=2.953, 95% 1.155 to 7.551, =0.024) were independent prognosis factors of perineum incision complications. For patients with low rectal cancer undergoing APR procedure, pelvic restoration wound be needed. The operation should be performed by experienced doctors, intraoperative blood loss should be reduced when possible.

摘要

评估影响低位直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术(APR)后会阴切口并发症的预后因素。这是一项对2013年1月至12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院结直肠外科连续接受APR的151例低位直肠癌患者的回顾性分析。患者包括95例男性和56例女性。患者的平均年龄为(57.3±10.9)岁(范围为31至79岁)。采用χ²检验和Logistic回归分析来确定会阴切口并发症的预后因素。在151例患者中,31例(20.5%)确诊发生会阴切口并发症,包括8例切口感染、22例会阴伤口愈合不良和1例切口瘘形成。单因素分析中,与会阴切口并发症相关的因素是美国麻醉医师协会分级(χ²=7.116,P=0.008)、术中失血(χ²=9.157,P=0.002),而与会阴切口并发症相关的保护因素是氟尿嘧啶缓释剂腹腔内化疗(χ²=5.020,P=0.025)、盆腔修复(χ²=10.158,P=0.001)、手术经验(χ²=7.334,P=0.007)。性别、年龄、体重指数、糖尿病、术前放化疗、血红蛋白水平、白蛋白水平、肿瘤远端距肛缘距离、APR手术方式、手术时间、术中输血、术后3天总引流量、肿瘤分化程度及术后TNM分期与会阴切口并发症无关(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,术中盆腔修复(β=0.200,95%CI 0.045至0.894,P=0.035)和术中失血(β=2.953,95%CI 1.155至7.551,P=0.024)是会阴切口并发症的独立预后因素。对于接受APR手术的低位直肠癌患者,需要进行盆腔修复。手术应由经验丰富的医生进行,尽可能减少术中失血。

相似文献

1
[Prognosis factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].[低位直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术后会阴切口并发症的预后因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 1;55(11):842-846. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.11.005.
2
[Establishment of a nomogram predicting risk factors of postoperative perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer].[建立预测直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术后会阴伤口并发症危险因素的列线图]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 25;22(4):357-363. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.04.008.
3
[Risk factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer].[腹会阴联合直肠癌切除术后会阴切口并发症的危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr;19(4):396-400.
4
[Risk factor analysis for perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection in elderly patients with rectal cancer].老年直肠癌患者腹会阴联合切除术后会阴切口并发症的危险因素分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 23;42(1):65-69. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2020.01.010.
5
[Application of transperineal single-port access assisted extralevator abdominoperineal excision in low rectal cancer].经会阴单孔通道辅助超低位经腹会阴联合切除术在低位直肠癌中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;19(3):274-7.
6
[Feasibility and short-outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision without changing position for distal rectal cancer].腹腔镜非改位经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的可行性及近期疗效
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;52(11):826-30.
7
[Cross suture closure technique of the perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection].腹会阴联合切除术后会阴伤口的交叉缝合闭合技术
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 25;21(8):936-939.
8
[Laparoscopy combined with transperineal extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced low rectal cancer].腹腔镜联合经会阴肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术治疗局部进展期低位直肠癌
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jun;19(6):654-8.
9
Morbidity and mortality following abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.低位直肠腺癌经腹会阴联合切除术的发病率和死亡率
Rev Invest Clin. 2001 Sep-Oct;53(5):388-95.
10
Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing after Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣修复改善局部晚期直肠癌放疗后腹会阴切除术后会阴伤口愈合。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1357-1365. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6363-3. Epub 2018 Mar 1.