Dong Yu, Li Ying, Jin Bo, Zhang Jie, Shao Jinchen, Peng Hong, Tu Shichun, Han Baohui
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 17;8(47):82244-82255. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19284. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
Previous studies have shown that the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma is associated with pathological characterization. In this study, we investigated whether pathology-based prognosis was further influenced by both tumor stage and oncogenic driver mutations. To this end, we recruited a cohort of 465 lung adenocarcinoma patients in China. These patients were classified into 6 pathology-defined subtypes i.e., lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA), acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma (APA), papillary-predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA), micropapillary-predominant adenocarcinoma (MPA), solid-predominant adenocarcinoma (SPA), and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA). Oncogenic mutations in , , , , and genes were determined using fluorescent real-time RT-PCR. The associations of pathogenic subtype or oncogenic mutation with clinical characteristics were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests. The interactive effects on overall survival (OS) by pathologic subtype, oncogenic mutations, and tumor stage were also determined. We have found that pathogenic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma correlated with smoking habit and tumor cell differentiation. These pathology-defined subtypes can be regrouped into 3 pathology-based prognostic groups: PPG1 (LPA), PPG2 (IMA+APA+PPA), and PPG3 (MPA+SPA) with a favorable, intermediate, and poor OS, respectively. We further demonstrated that this pathology-determined OS can be affected by both tumor stage and status of oncogenic mutations in , , , , and genes. Interestingly, the presence of genetic mutations related to , and had an opposite effect on OS between PPG2 (worsen) and PPG3 (improved) patients, reversing the prognostic favorability for patients within these two groups. In conclusion, prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma was defined interactively by pathologic subtype, tumor stage and oncogenic mutation.
既往研究表明,肺腺癌的预后与病理特征相关。在本研究中,我们调查了基于病理的预后是否会进一步受到肿瘤分期和致癌驱动基因突变的影响。为此,我们在中国招募了465例肺腺癌患者。这些患者被分为6种病理定义的亚型,即鳞屑状为主型腺癌(LPA)、腺泡状为主型腺癌(APA)、乳头状为主型腺癌(PPA)、微乳头状为主型腺癌(MPA)、实体为主型腺癌(SPA)和浸润性黏液腺癌(IMA)。使用荧光实时逆转录聚合酶链反应测定、、、和基因中的致癌突变。采用Fisher精确检验分析致病亚型或致癌突变与临床特征的相关性。还确定了病理亚型、致癌突变和肿瘤分期对总生存期(OS)的交互作用。我们发现肺腺癌的致病亚型与吸烟习惯和肿瘤细胞分化相关。这些病理定义的亚型可重新分为3个基于病理的预后组:PPG1(LPA)、PPG2(IMA+APA+PPA)和PPG3(MPA+SPA),其OS分别为良好、中等和较差。我们进一步证明,这种由病理决定的OS会受到肿瘤分期以及、、、和基因致癌突变状态的影响。有趣的是,与、和相关的基因突变的存在对PPG2(恶化)和PPG3(改善)患者的OS有相反的影响,逆转了这两组患者的预后优势。总之肺腺癌的预后是由病理亚型、肿瘤分期和致癌突变相互作用定义的。