García Caballero R, Herreros B, Real de Asúa D, Gámez S, Vega G, García Olmos L
Grupo de Trabajo de Bioética de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna, Madrid, España; Unidad de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España; Instituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea, Madrid, España.
Grupo de Trabajo de Bioética de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna, Madrid, España; Unidad de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España; Instituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea, Madrid, España.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2018 Jan-Feb;218(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
There is little information on the limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) in patients admitted to hospital internal medicine units.
To describe the indicated LTE regimens in the departments of internal medicine and the characteristics of the patients who undergo them.
An observational, descriptive retrospective study was conducted on 4 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. The study collected demographic and comorbidity data and the LTE orders prescribed for all patients who died during a period of 6 months.
The study included 382 patients with a mean age of 85±10 years; 204 were women (53.4%) and 222 (58.1%) came from their homes. Some 51.1% of the patients were terminal, 43.2% had moderate to severe dementia, and 95.5% presented at least moderate comorbidity. Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were "No cardiopulmonary resuscitation" (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), "Do not use aggressive measures" (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and "Do not transfer to an intensive care unit" (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were "No cardiopulmonary resuscitation" (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), "Do not use aggressive measures" (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and "Do not transfer to an intensive care unit" (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7).
LTE is common among patients who die in Internal Medicine. The most widely used regimens were "No CPR" and the unspecific statement "Do not use aggressive measures". The patients were elderly and had significant comorbidity, terminal illness and advanced dementia.
关于住院内科病房患者的治疗努力限制(LTE)的信息很少。
描述内科各科室规定的LTE方案以及接受这些方案的患者特征。
对马德里自治区的4家医院进行了一项观察性、描述性回顾性研究。该研究收集了人口统计学和合并症数据,以及在6个月期间所有死亡患者所开具的LTE医嘱。
该研究纳入了382例患者,平均年龄为85±10岁;204例为女性(53.4%),222例(58.1%)来自家中。约51.1%的患者处于终末期,43.2%患有中度至重度痴呆,95.5%至少存在中度合并症。318例患者(83.7%)接受了某种类型的LTE;最常见的医嘱是“不进行心肺复苏”(292例患者,76.4%;95%置信区间72.1 - 80.8)、“不采取积极措施”(113例患者,16.4%;95%置信区间13.7 - 19.4)和“不转入重症监护病房”(102例,14.8%,95%置信区间12.3 - 17.7)。318例患者(83.7%)接受了某种类型的LTE;最常见的医嘱是“不进行心肺复苏”(292例患者,76.4%;95%置信区间72.1 - 80.8)、“不采取积极措施”(113例患者,16.4%;95%置信区间13.7 - 19.4)和“不转入重症监护病房”(102例,14.8%,95%置信区间12.3 - 17.7)。
LTE在内科死亡患者中很常见。使用最广泛的方案是“不进行心肺复苏”和非特异性声明“不采取积极措施”。患者年龄较大,有明显的合并症、终末期疾病和晚期痴呆。