• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品捆绑作为一种健康推动策略:运用行为经济学研究消费者水果和蔬菜选择。

Food bundling as a health nudge: Investigating consumer fruit and vegetable selection using behavioral economics.

机构信息

Department of Consumer Science and Behavioral Research Insights Through Experiments Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

Center for Economic and Social Research and Department of Economics, University of Southern California, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.082. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.082
PMID:29137968
Abstract

Displaying bundles of healthy foods at the grocery store is a health nudge that simplifies shopping and may have the potential for increasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) purchasing. To evaluate the impact of food bundling, we conduct an artefactual field experiment with community participants in a laboratory set up as a grocery store. Dual-self theory suggests that food choices may differ depending on whether shoppers are under cognitive load - in our experiment, we exogenously vary whether bundles are displayed (with and without a price discount) and whether shoppers are under cognitive load. Our findings align with prior studies that suggest unhealthy options are more likely to be selected when cognitive resources are constrained. When bundles are displayed, we observe increased F&V purchasing. We also observe a significant interaction between cognitive load and price discounting. We find discounted bundles are more effective in the absence of cognitive load, but non-discounted bundles are more effective when shoppers are under cognitive load. Although more research is warranted, our findings suggest that when shopping under cognitive load, it is possible that discounts impose additional cognitive strain on the shopping experience. For retailers and policymakers, our results point to the potential power of bundling as a strategy for increasing healthy food purchasing.

摘要

在杂货店展示健康食品束是一种健康促进措施,可以简化购物过程,并有可能增加水果和蔬菜(F&V)的购买量。为了评估食品捆绑的影响,我们在一个实验室环境中(模拟成一个杂货店)进行了一项准实验研究,参与者是社区居民。双重自我理论表明,食品选择可能会因购物者的认知负荷而异——在我们的实验中,我们外生地改变了捆绑是否展示(有或没有价格折扣)以及购物者是否处于认知负荷状态。我们的研究结果与先前的研究一致,这些研究表明,当认知资源受到限制时,不健康的选择更有可能被选中。当捆绑销售时,我们观察到 F&V 的购买量增加。我们还观察到认知负荷和价格折扣之间存在显著的相互作用。我们发现,在没有认知负荷的情况下,有折扣的捆绑销售更有效,但在购物者处于认知负荷的情况下,没有折扣的捆绑销售更有效。尽管还需要更多的研究,但我们的研究结果表明,当在认知负荷下购物时,折扣可能会给购物体验带来额外的认知压力。对于零售商和政策制定者来说,我们的研究结果表明,捆绑销售作为一种增加健康食品购买的策略具有潜在的力量。

相似文献

1
Food bundling as a health nudge: Investigating consumer fruit and vegetable selection using behavioral economics.食品捆绑作为一种健康推动策略:运用行为经济学研究消费者水果和蔬菜选择。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.082. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
2
Effect of a price discount and consumer education strategy on food and beverage purchases in remote Indigenous Australia: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.偏远地区澳大利亚原住民的食品和饮料购买行为:价格折扣和消费者教育策略的影响:一项阶梯式随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e82-e95. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30043-3. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Consumer Preference for Food Bundles under Cognitive Load: A Grocery Shopping Experiment.认知负荷下消费者对食品组合的偏好:一项食品购物实验
Foods. 2022 Mar 27;11(7):973. doi: 10.3390/foods11070973.
4
Shopping for fruits and vegetables. Food and retail qualities of importance to low-income households at the grocery store.购买水果和蔬菜。低收入家庭在杂货店对食品和零售质量的重视。
Appetite. 2010 Apr;54(2):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.015. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
5
The impact of financial incentives on participants' food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial.在一项基于超市的随机对照试验中,经济激励对参与者食品购买模式的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 25;14(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0.
6
' - Australian shoppers' experiences with online grocery platforms.- 澳大利亚消费者对在线食品杂货平台的体验。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 May 14;27(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001046.
7
Fruit and vegetable purchasing and the relative density of healthy and unhealthy food stores: evidence from an Australian multilevel study.水果和蔬菜购买与健康和不健康食品店的相对密度:来自澳大利亚多层次研究的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Mar;67(3):231-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201535. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
8
Discounts on fruit and vegetables combined with a space management intervention increased sales in supermarkets.水果和蔬菜的折扣,再加上空间管理干预措施,提高了超市的销售额。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;71(4):476-480. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.272. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Using the Australian Dietary Guidelines 2&5 education message in supermarket shopping trolleys to nudge shoppers to purchase more fruit and vegetables: A feasibility study using an intervention design.利用澳大利亚饮食指南 2&5 的教育信息在超市购物车中引导购物者购买更多的水果和蔬菜:使用干预设计的可行性研究。
Nutr Bull. 2024 Jun;49(2):189-198. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12674. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Food and beverage price discounts to improve health in remote Aboriginal communities: mixed method evaluation of a natural experiment.食品和饮料价格折扣对改善偏远原住民社区健康状况的影响:一项自然实验的混合方法评估
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Feb;41(1):32-37. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12616. Epub 2016 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
How behavioral economics can inform the next mass vaccination campaign: A narrative review.行为经济学如何为下一次大规模疫苗接种运动提供信息:一项叙述性综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jan 24;32:102118. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102118. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Effect of Financial Incentives and Default Options on Food Choices of Adults With Low Income in Online Retail Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励和默认选项对低收入成年人在线零售环境下食物选择的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232371. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2371.
3
Consumer Preference for Food Bundles under Cognitive Load: A Grocery Shopping Experiment.
认知负荷下消费者对食品组合的偏好:一项食品购物实验
Foods. 2022 Mar 27;11(7):973. doi: 10.3390/foods11070973.
4
Improving Healthy Food Choices in Low-Income Settings in the United States Using Behavioral Economic-Based Adaptations to Choice Architecture.利用基于行为经济学的选择架构调整措施改善美国低收入地区的健康食品选择
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 6;8:734991. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.734991. eCollection 2021.
5
Food environment solutions for childhood obesity in Latin America and among Latinos living in the United States.拉丁美洲和生活在美国的拉丁裔儿童肥胖的食物环境解决方案。
Obes Rev. 2021 Jun;22 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e13237. doi: 10.1111/obr.13237.
6
Proposal of a New Orange Selection Process Using Sensory Panels and AHP.采用感官小组和层次分析法的新型橙子选择流程的提案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073333.
7
The East Side Table Make-at-Home Meal-Kit Program is feasible and acceptable: A pilot study.《东城区餐桌自制餐包计划的可行性和可接受性:一项试点研究》
Appetite. 2021 May 1;160:105087. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105087. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
8
Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption.改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草制品的可得性或接近程度,以改变其选择和消费情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):CD012573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012573.pub3.
9
Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption.改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草制品的可得性或接近程度,以改变其选择和消费情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 27;8(8):CD012573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012573.pub2.
10
Evaluation of three behavioural economics 'nudges' on grocery and convenience store sales of promoted nutritious foods.评价三种行为经济学“助推”策略对食品杂货和便利店促销营养食品销售的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3250-3260. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001794. Epub 2019 Jul 23.