Suppr超能文献

模拟对哮喘药物和治疗侵入性的信念对依从性和对每日一次与每日两次药物的偏好的影响。

Modelling the effect of beliefs about asthma medication and treatment intrusiveness on adherence and preference for once-daily vs. twice-daily medication.

机构信息

University of Bath, Bath, UK.

GSK, Brentford, UK.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Nov 14;27(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0061-7.

Abstract

People with asthma who do not adhere to their maintenance medication may experience poorer asthma control and need more healthcare support than those who adhere. People (N = 1010) aged 18-55 years with self-reported asthma, taking one or more asthma maintenance medication(s), from five European countries, participated in a survey using validated scales (Medication Adherence Report Scale [MARS], Asthma Control Test™ [ACT], Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire [BMQ] and the Asthma Treatment Intrusiveness Questionnaire [ATIQ]). We performed a post hoc evaluation of adherence to maintenance medication, asthma control, beliefs about medication, preferences for once-daily vs. twice-daily asthma maintenance medication and treatment intrusiveness, using structural equation modelling to investigate the relationships between these factors. Most participants reported potential problems with asthma control (ACT < 19: 76.8% [n = 776]), low adherence (median MARS = 3.40) and preferred once-daily medication (73.5% [n = 742/1010]). Non-adherence was associated with worse asthma control (r = 0.262 [P < 0.001]) and a expressed preference for once-daily medication over a "twice daily medication that works slightly better" (test statistic [T] = 2.970 [P = 0.003]). Participants reporting non-adherence/preferring once-daily medication had negative beliefs about their treatment (BMQ necessity-concerns differential: r = 0.437 [P < 0.001]/T = 6.886 [P < 0.001]) and found medication intrusive (ATIQ: r = -0.422 [P < 0.001]/T = 2.689[P = 0.007]). Structural equation modelling showed complex relationships between variables, including: (1) high concerns about treatment associated with increased perceived treatment intrusiveness and reduced adherence, which influenced asthma control; (2) high concerns about treatment and healthcare seeking behaviour, which were predictive of preferring twice-daily asthma medication. Concerns about medication and perceived treatment intrusiveness were predictive of poor adherence, and were associated with preference for once-daily asthma medication. Confirm the utility of the PAPA model and NCF in explaining nonadherence linked to poor asthma control.

摘要

哮喘患者如果不坚持使用维持药物,其哮喘控制可能较差,需要更多的医疗保健支持,而坚持用药的患者则不需要。本研究共纳入来自五个欧洲国家的 1010 名年龄在 18-55 岁之间、自我报告患有哮喘、使用一种或多种哮喘维持药物的患者,使用经过验证的量表(用药依从性报告量表 [MARS]、哮喘控制测试 [ACT]、药物信念问卷 [BMQ]和哮喘治疗侵扰问卷 [ATIQ])进行调查。我们使用结构方程模型对维持药物的使用、哮喘控制、药物信念、对每日一次与每日两次哮喘维持药物的偏好以及治疗侵扰性之间的关系进行了事后评估,以调查这些因素之间的关系。大多数患者报告哮喘控制存在潜在问题(ACT<19:76.8%[n=776])、用药依从性低(MARS 中位数为 3.40)和更喜欢每日一次的药物治疗(73.5%[n=742/1010])。用药不依从与哮喘控制较差(r=0.262,P<0.001)和表达对每日一次药物治疗的偏好(即“一种作用稍强但每日两次的药物”)相关(检验统计量[T]=2.970,P=0.003)。报告不依从/更喜欢每日一次药物治疗的患者对其治疗有负面的看法(BMQ 必要性担忧差异:r=0.437,P<0.001/T=6.886,P<0.001),并认为药物治疗有侵扰性(ATIQ:r=-0.422,P<0.001/T=2.689,P=0.007)。结构方程模型显示了变量之间的复杂关系,包括:(1)对治疗的高度关注与治疗感知侵扰性的增加和依从性的降低有关,这会影响哮喘控制;(2)对治疗和医疗保健的高度关注,这与更喜欢每日两次的哮喘药物有关。对药物的担忧和对治疗侵扰性的感知与较差的依从性有关,并与对每日一次哮喘药物的偏好有关。验证 PAPA 模型和 NCF 在解释与哮喘控制不良相关的不依从方面的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147d/5686129/0a6a7e724951/41533_2017_61_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验