• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Outsource Power, Import Safety? Challenges and Opportunities of the U.S.-China Food Safety Regulatory Cooperation.

作者信息

Lin Ching-Fu

出版信息

Food Drug Law J. 2017;72(1):32-52.

PMID:29140653
Abstract

The United States has a high stake in China’s serious food safety problem, as food products of Chinese origin have dominated the U.S. food market in numerous areas and continue to grow. The conclusion of the U.S.-China Food Safety Agreement (“the Agreement”) has allowed FDA to strengthen regulatory cooperation with its Chinese counterpart in various aspects. The Agreement also paves the way for the implementation of the new regulatory tools incorporated in FSMA, especially in the cross-border context. However, both the Agreement and FSMA have certain crucial limitations that may create future hurdles to effective implementation in the U.S.-China cooperation. This paper therefore endeavors to first examine China’s governance challenges over food safety, with a focus on the 2009 Food Safety Law, the 2015 Amendment, and the fundamental problem of “thin” rule of law. This paper moves to analyze the U.S.-China Food Safety Agreement, reviewing the agreement’s strengths and weaknesses. It further assesses FSMA’s innovative institutional design to regulate imported food products and its limitations. However, both the U.S.-China Food Safety Agreement and FSMA arguably create a regulatory dilemma for FDA when addressing imported food safety, due to structural mismatch between the broad scope of power granted to FDA and the long chain of power outsourcing to governments or private companies as primary “regulators.” Neither the Agreement nor FSMA give FDA adequate capacity to closely oversee such “agents” along the chain of power outsourcing. Framing the U.S.-China food safety cooperation as a multilayer structure that “outsources power” to “import safety,” this paper concludes by stressing the need for a robust accountability and effective mechanism for U.S.-China food safety cooperation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Outsource Power, Import Safety? Challenges and Opportunities of the U.S.-China Food Safety Regulatory Cooperation.
Food Drug Law J. 2017;72(1):32-52.
2
A Legislative Reform for the Food Safety System of China: A Regulatory Paradigm Shift and Collaborative Governance.中国食品安全体系的立法改革:监管范式转变与协同治理
Food Drug Law J. 2015;70(3):453-80, ii-iii.
3
The Food Safety Modernization Act: Implications for U.S. Small Scale Farms.
Am J Law Med. 2015;41(2-3):395-405. doi: 10.1177/0098858815591524.
4
Harmonization of legislation and regulations to achieve food safety: US and Canada perspective.协调法律法规以实现食品安全:美国和加拿大的视角
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Aug;94(10):1947-53. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6295. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
New food safety law: effectiveness on the ground.新食品安全法:落地生效。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(5):689-700. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.654368.
6
Public-private interactions in global food safety governance.全球食品安全治理中的公私互动。
Food Drug Law J. 2014;69(2):143-60, i.
7
Food safety. Food safety law will likely strain FDA science.食品安全。食品安全法可能会使美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的科研工作面临压力。
Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):270. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6015.270.
8
Prior notice of imported food under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002. Final rule.根据2002年《公共卫生安全与生物恐怖主义防范和应对法》对进口食品的预先通知。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2008 Nov 7;73(217):66293-410.
9
Establishment, maintenance, and availability of records: amendment to record availability requirements. Interim final rule; request for comments.记录的建立、维护与可获取性:记录可获取性要求的修订。暂行最终规则;征求意见
Fed Regist. 2012 Feb 23;77(36):10658-62.
10
Assessing the Relative Influence and Efficacy of Public and Private Food Safety Regulation Regimes: Comparing Codex and Global G.A.P. Standards.评估公共和私营食品安全监管制度的相对影响和效力:比较食品法典标准和全球良好农业规范标准
Food Drug Law J. 2017;72(2):262-94.