Suppr超能文献

高压电刺激与超声治疗压疮的对比研究

High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation Versus Ultrasound in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers.

作者信息

Bora Karsli Pinar, Gurcay Eda, Karaahmet Ozgur Zeliha, Cakci Aytul

机构信息

Pinar Bora Karsli, MD, is a Specialist; Eda Gurcay, MD, is Associate Professor; Ozgur Zeliha Karaahmet, MD, is a Specialist; and Aytul Cakci, MD, is a Specialist at the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017 Dec;30(12):565-570. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000526606.72489.99.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) with ultrasound (US) in treating Stage II through Stage IV pressure ulcers (PrUs)* of hospitalized patients.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a prospective, controlled trial in which patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS

A total of 27 patients (22 male, 5 female) hospitalized for neurologic rehabilitation in the Clinic of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Stage II through Stage IV PrUs were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to either HVES or US treatment group, and all patients underwent standard wound care. Over 4 to 12 weeks, HVES was applied for 60 minutes 3 times per week, and US was applied 3 times per week.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Properties of the PrUs were noted during pre- and posttreatment.

RESULTS

The PrUs of patients in the HVES and US groups healed at a mean rate of 43% and 63%, respectively. There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in healing found after treatment. Regression analysis was performed for the factors that could influence the wound surface areas, and significant effects were detected among the level of ambulation, pretreatment stage, and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HVES and US are promising methods for wound healing, and both electrotherapy modalities have been demonstrated to support the healing of PrUs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估并比较高压电刺激(HVES)与超声(US)治疗住院患者Ⅱ期至Ⅳ期压疮(PrUs)的疗效。

设计

本研究设计为一项前瞻性对照试验,患者被随机分为两组。

参与者和设置

本研究纳入了27例在物理医学与康复诊所因神经康复住院、患有Ⅱ期至Ⅳ期压疮的患者(22例男性,5例女性)。患者被随机分配至HVES或US治疗组,所有患者均接受标准伤口护理。在4至12周内,HVES每周应用3次,每次60分钟,US每周应用3次。

主要观察指标

在治疗前和治疗后记录压疮的特征。

结果

HVES组和US组患者的压疮愈合平均率分别为43%和63%。治疗后两组间愈合情况无统计学显著差异。对可能影响伤口表面积的因素进行回归分析,发现活动水平、治疗前阶段和吸烟之间存在显著影响。

结论

HVES和US都是促进伤口愈合的有前景的方法,两种电疗法均已被证明可支持压疮的愈合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验