*Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom; and†Gastroenterology, Royal Devon & Exeter Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Dec;23(12):2083-2088. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001258.
Virtual biologics clinics are often used to review patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving biological therapy, with decisions whether to continue, switch, or stop therapy made based on review of symptoms, disease history, and investigations. We aimed to investigate whether therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and anti-drug antibodies influences decision making within a virtual biologics clinic.
For all patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving IFX maintenance therapy, 2 decisions were recorded in a preset format. The first decision was based on assessment of clinical details, with clinicians blinded to IFX trough levels and anti-drug antibodies. The second decision was made after unblinding of these data.
Among 191 patients (mean age 40 years; 106 (55.5%) male), IFX trough levels were sub-therapeutic in 53 (27.7%) (<2 mg/L), therapeutic in 100 (52.4%), and supra-therapeutic in 38 (19.9%) (>6 mg/L). Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 58 (30.4%), and were >50 AU/mL in 26 (13.6%). Blinded treatment decisions were changed on unblinding these data in 56 cases (29.3%; P < 0.0001). Knowledge of these data led to 7 (3.7%) patients receiving intensified IFX, whereas 33 (17.3%) patients were able to either dose de-escalate or stop IFX.
Basing decisions on therapeutic drug monitoring, rather than clinical acumen alone, led to a change in almost one-third of decisions made, offering considerable cost savings and reducing exposure to potentially toxic therapies. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered an integral part of annual biologics assessment (see Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/IBD/B629).
虚拟生物制剂门诊常用于审查接受生物治疗的炎症性肠病患者,根据症状、病史和检查结果来决定是否继续、转换或停止治疗。我们旨在研究英夫利昔单抗(IFX)谷浓度和抗药物抗体的治疗药物监测是否会影响虚拟生物制剂门诊的决策。
所有接受 IFX 维持治疗的炎症性肠病患者均按预设格式记录 2 项决策。第一项决策基于临床细节评估,临床医生对 IFX 谷浓度和抗药物抗体不知情。第二项决策在这些数据揭晓后做出。
在 191 例患者(平均年龄 40 岁;106 例[55.5%]男性)中,53 例(27.7%)IFX 谷浓度不足(<2mg/L),100 例(52.4%)治疗浓度,38 例(19.9%)浓度过高(>6mg/L)。检测到 58 例(30.4%)抗药物抗体,其中 26 例(13.6%)>50AU/mL。对这些数据进行盲法处理后,有 56 例(29.3%)治疗决策发生改变(P<0.0001)。这些数据的知晓导致 7 例(3.7%)患者接受强化 IFX 治疗,而 33 例(17.3%)患者能够减少 IFX 剂量或停药。
基于治疗药物监测而不是仅凭临床敏锐性做出决策,使近三分之一的决策发生改变,从而节省了大量成本,并减少了潜在毒性治疗的暴露。常规治疗药物监测应被视为年度生物制剂评估的一个组成部分(见视频摘要,补充数字内容 1,http://links.lww.com/IBD/B629)。