Suppr超能文献

通过对抗肿瘤坏死因子药物水平进行主动和被动检测的了解,改变了克罗恩病的管理决策。

Management Decisions in Crohn's Disease Are Changed by Knowledge of Proactive and Reactive Testing of Antitumor Necrosis Factor Drug Levels.

作者信息

Wu Yang, Wen Amy, Selvanderan Shane P, Xuan Wei, Andrews Jane M, Koo Jenn H, Williams Astrid-Jane, Ng Watson, Connor Susan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Jul 13;3(3):otab042. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab042. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the proactive clinical application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologic drugs in Crohn's disease (CD). One way to practically assess this is to examine how TDM influences management decisions. We examined how knowledge of proactive and reactive antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drug levels changes management in a variety of clinical scenarios.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all adults with CD having trough level infliximab or adalimumab measurements at Liverpool Hospital between June 2013 and July 2016 were included. Demographics, indications for testing, anti-TNF drug levels, and treatment details were collected along with subsequent management decisions. The decision made by the treating clinician after receiving the drug level was compared to a consensus decision from a panel of 3 gastroenterologists based on the clinical, laboratory, imaging, and/or endoscopic results without the drug level. When these 2 decisions were discrepant, the anti-TNF drug level was deemed to have changed management.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-seven trough levels of infliximab or adalimumab from 108 patients were analyzed. Overall, assessment of anti-TNF levels affected management in 46.9% of the instances. Knowledge of the drug level was also more likely to result in management change when the test was performed for reactive TDM compared to proactive TDM (63% vs 36%, = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of TDM of anti-TNF agents to routine investigations alters management decisions in adult CD patients on anti-TNF therapy in both proactive and reactive settings.

摘要

背景

对于生物制剂治疗药物监测(TDM)在克罗恩病(CD)中的前瞻性临床应用存在争议。一种实际评估方法是研究TDM如何影响管理决策。我们研究了在各种临床场景中,抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)药物水平的前瞻性和反应性知识如何改变管理方式。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入了2013年6月至2016年7月在利物浦医院进行英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗谷浓度测量的所有成年CD患者。收集人口统计学资料、检测指征、抗TNF药物水平和治疗细节以及随后的管理决策。将治疗临床医生在收到药物水平后做出的决策与由3名胃肠病学家组成的小组根据临床、实验室、影像学和/或内镜检查结果(不包括药物水平)做出的共识决策进行比较。当这两个决策不一致时,抗TNF药物水平被认为改变了管理方式。

结果

分析了108例患者的187次英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗谷浓度。总体而言,抗TNF水平评估在46.9%的情况下影响了管理。与前瞻性TDM相比,当进行反应性TDM检测时,药物水平知识也更有可能导致管理改变(63%对36%,P = 0.001)。

结论

在常规检查中增加抗TNF药物的TDM会改变接受抗TNF治疗的成年CD患者在主动和反应性情况下的管理决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/600f/9802446/5aceaad50469/otab042f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验