Høiseth A, Reikerås O, Fønstelien E
Department of Radiology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Radiol. 1989 Jan-Feb;30(1):69-73.
A variety of methods exist for determining femoral neck anteversion. There is, however, no consistent definition or reference method by which the correctness of the measurements can be determined. In this report the precision of a specific definition of femoral neck anteversion is estimated by means of a reference method. Three different radiologic measuring methods based on fundamentally different principles are evaluated by comparison with this reference. It is concluded that: 1) The Dunlap/Rippstein method can be recommended as the standard method. 2) Computed tomography may have substantial sources of error. 3) Methods based on arbitrary projections have poor precision.
存在多种用于确定股骨颈前倾角的方法。然而,对于测量的正确性,没有一致的定义或参考方法来确定。在本报告中,通过一种参考方法来估计股骨颈前倾角特定定义的精度。通过与该参考进行比较,对基于根本不同原理的三种不同放射学测量方法进行了评估。得出以下结论:1)邓拉普/里普斯坦方法可推荐为标准方法。2)计算机断层扫描可能有大量误差来源。3)基于任意投影的方法精度较差。