Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Hui Zhou Municipal Central Hospital, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jun 1;142(11):2198-2206. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31157. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, their efficacy and safety is poorly understood. Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR agents administered concurrently with standard therapies for HNSCC. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated addition of EGFR targeted therapy versus standard therapy alone were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), locoregional control, and severe adverse events (SAEs, grade ≥ 3). Sixteen eligible trials with 4031 patients were included. Addition of anti-EGFR regimens to standard therapy significantly improved OS of patients with HNSCC (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96), with a moderately elevated rate of SAEs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). Subgroup analysis indicated that the survival benefit was observed when cetuximab was administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) for stage III/IV patients (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.94; p = 0.01), or with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95; p = 0.005). Significantly increased ORR (RR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.05-2.18) and PFS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) were found in R/M HNSCC patients treated with anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy, while no significant improvements were found in stage III/IV patients treated with anti-EGFR plus standard therapy. In conclusion, addition of cetuximab to standard therapy may improve outcomes for R/M HNSCC patients, while causing a moderate increase in SAEs. For stage III/IV patients, anti-EGFR mAb plus RT can improve OS compared with RT alone, while replacement of chemotherapy with EGFR mAb or adding EGFR mAb to combined chemotherapy and RT did not improve outcomes.
表皮生长因子受体 (EGFR) 靶向药物被用于治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌 (HNSCC);然而,其疗效和安全性仍不清楚。在这里,我们评估了 EGFR 靶向药物联合标准治疗 HNSCC 的疗效和安全性。纳入评估 EGFR 靶向治疗联合标准治疗与单独标准治疗比较的随机对照试验。主要结局为总生存 (OS)。次要结局为无进展生存 (PFS)、总缓解率 (ORR)、局部区域控制和严重不良事件 (SAEs,≥3 级)。纳入了 16 项包含 4031 例患者的合格试验。与标准治疗相比,EGFR 靶向治疗的加入显著改善了 HNSCC 患者的 OS(HR=0.89;95%CI,0.82-0.96),但 SAE 发生率略有升高(RR=1.08;95%CI,1.03-1.13)。亚组分析表明,西妥昔单抗联合放疗(RT)治疗 III/IV 期患者(HR=0.76;95%CI,0.61-0.94;p=0.01),或联合化疗治疗复发性或转移性(R/M)HNSCC 患者(HR=0.86;95%CI,0.78-0.95;p=0.005)可获得生存获益。在接受抗 EGFR 联合化疗的 R/M HNSCC 患者中,ORR(RR=1.51;95%CI 1.05-2.18)和 PFS(HR=0.72;95%CI,0.59-0.88)显著增加,而在接受抗 EGFR 联合标准治疗的 III/IV 期患者中,未见显著改善。总之,西妥昔单抗联合标准治疗可能改善 R/M HNSCC 患者的结局,同时导致 SAE 中度增加。对于 III/IV 期患者,与单独 RT 相比,EGFR mAb 联合 RT 可改善 OS,而用 EGFR mAb 替代化疗或联合化疗和 RT 中加入 EGFR mAb 并未改善结局。