Bhardwaj Megha, Erben Vanessa, Schrotz-King Petra, Brenner Hermann
Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2017 Nov 16;9(11):156. doi: 10.3390/cancers9110156.
In order to find low abundant proteins secretome and tumor tissue proteome data have been explored in the last few years for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). In this review we aim to summarize the results of studies evaluating markers derived from the secretome and tumor proteome for blood based detection of colorectal cancer. Observing the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for relevant studies published up to 18 July 2017. After screening for predefined eligibility criteria a total of 47 studies were identified. Information on diagnostic performance indicators, methodological procedures and validation was extracted. Functions of proteins were identified from the UniProt database and the the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess study quality. Forty seven studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Overall, 83 different proteins were identified, with carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) being by far the most commonly reported (reported in 24 studies). Evaluation of the markers or marker combinations in blood samples from CRC cases and controls yielded apparently very promising diagnostic performances, with area under the curve >0.9 in several cases, but lack of internal or external validation, overoptimism due to overfitting and spectrum bias due to evaluation in clinical setting rather than screening settings are major concerns. Secretome and tumor proteome-based biomarkers when validated in blood yield promising candidates. However, for discovered protein markers to be clinically applicable as screening tool they have to be specific for early stages and need to be validated externally in larger studies with participants recruited in true screening setting.
为了寻找低丰度蛋白质,在过去几年中,人们对分泌组和肿瘤组织蛋白质组数据进行了探索,以用于结直肠癌(CRC)的诊断。在本综述中,我们旨在总结评估源自分泌组和肿瘤蛋白质组的标志物用于基于血液检测结直肠癌的研究结果。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中系统检索了截至2017年7月18日发表的相关研究。在根据预定义的纳入标准进行筛选后,共确定了47项研究。提取了有关诊断性能指标、方法程序和验证的信息。从UniProt数据库中确定蛋白质的功能,并使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)工具评估研究质量。确定了47项符合纳入标准的研究。总体而言,共鉴定出83种不同的蛋白质,其中癌胚抗原(CEA)是迄今为止报道最多的(在24项研究中被报道)。对结直肠癌病例和对照的血液样本中的标志物或标志物组合进行评估,其诊断性能显然非常有前景,在一些情况下曲线下面积>0.9,但缺乏内部或外部验证、因过度拟合导致的过度乐观以及因在临床环境而非筛查环境中评估导致的谱偏差是主要问题。基于分泌组和肿瘤蛋白质组的生物标志物在血液中得到验证时可产生有前景的候选物。然而,对于发现的蛋白质标志物要作为筛查工具在临床上适用,它们必须对早期阶段具有特异性,并且需要在真正的筛查环境中招募参与者的更大规模研究中进行外部验证。