Christopher M A, Harman E, Hendeles L
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Chest. 1989 Feb;95(2):309-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.2.309.
The results of previously published studies indicate that calcium channel blockers are capable of competitively inhibiting cytochrome P-450 activity in hepatic microsomes, the pathway of theophylline metabolism. In addition, case reports have suggested that theophylline serum concentrations change when a calcium channel blocker has been added to or deleted from a stable theophylline regimen. To determine the clinical relevance of this potential interaction in patients with chronic asthma, we measured a peak steady-state theophylline serum concentration in 21 subjects while receiving theophylline alone (400 to 1,500 mg/day), and again, at least seven days later, after the addition of continuous therapy with maximally tolerated doses of either diltiazem (n = 18) or nifedipine (n = 16). The diltiazem dose was increased in 120 mg/day increments, as tolerated, to a maximum of 240 to 480 mg/day, while the nifedipine dose was increased in increments of 40 mg/day, to a maximum dose of 80 to 160 mg/day. The mean +/- SEM theophylline serum concentrations were 13.6 +/- 1.4 micrograms/ml before and 14.0 +/- 1.2 micrograms/ml during concurrent diltiazem therapy, and 12.6 +/- 1.0 micrograms/ml before and 12.2 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml during nifedipine (p greater than 0.05). With this sample size there is a 5 percent chance that we missed a 20 percent change in serum concentration (type II error). Thus, maximum tolerated doses of diltiazem or nifedipine do not impair the metabolism of theophylline to a clinically relevant degree and adjustment of theophylline dosage is not required after the addition or discontinuation of diltiazem or nifedipine. In addition, these data suggest that currently available in vitro techniques for evaluating drug interactions in the hepatocyte do not predict the clinical relevance of such an interaction in patients who might require both drugs for different therapeutic indications.
先前发表的研究结果表明,钙通道阻滞剂能够竞争性抑制肝微粒体中的细胞色素P - 450活性,而肝微粒体是茶碱代谢的途径。此外,病例报告显示,当在稳定的茶碱治疗方案中添加或停用钙通道阻滞剂时,茶碱的血清浓度会发生变化。为了确定这种潜在相互作用在慢性哮喘患者中的临床相关性,我们测量了21名受试者在单独接受茶碱治疗(400至1500毫克/天)时的稳态茶碱血清峰值浓度,并且在至少七天后,在添加最大耐受剂量的地尔硫䓬(n = 18)或硝苯地平(n = 16)进行持续治疗后再次测量。地尔硫䓬剂量以每天120毫克的增量增加,直至最大剂量为240至480毫克/天,而硝苯地平剂量以每天40毫克的增量增加,直至最大剂量为80至160毫克/天。在接受地尔硫䓬联合治疗期间,茶碱血清浓度的平均值±标准误在治疗前为13.6±1.4微克/毫升,治疗期间为14.0±1.2微克/毫升;在接受硝苯地平治疗期间,治疗前为12.6±1.0微克/毫升,治疗期间为12.2±1.1微克/毫升(p>0.05)。以这个样本量,我们有5%的可能性遗漏了血清浓度20%的变化(II类错误)。因此,最大耐受剂量的地尔硫䓬或硝苯地平不会在临床上显著损害茶碱的代谢,在添加或停用这些药物后不需要调整茶碱剂量。此外,这些数据表明,目前用于评估肝细胞中药物相互作用的体外技术并不能预测在可能因不同治疗指征而需要两种药物的患者中这种相互作用的临床相关性。