Department of Angiology, MD Barbantini Clinic, Lucca, Italy.
Professor Emeritus Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
Bandage application does not exert consistent compression pressure, leading to extremely variable compression when applied to patients. A new elastic bandage can exert a predefined pressure independently of healthcare providers and the size of the wrapped limb. The bandage system includes a series of non-stretchable patches that when applied to the bandage make it stiff. The aim of this work was to assess, in an experimental setting, the venous ejection fraction (EF) from the lower leg and the tolerability of this new bandage in a group of patients affected by superficial venous incompetence.
EF was measured using strain gauge plethysmography under baseline conditions and the bandage was applied with a supine pressure of 20 and 30 mmHg, with and without the stiff patches, in 25 patients with severe venous reflux in the great saphenous vein. The interface pressure of the bandages was measured simultaneously in the medial gaiter area.
All patients showed EF values that were significantly reduced compared with normal individuals. Elastic bandages with an average pressure of 20 and 30 mmHg in the supine position achieved a slight improvement in EF, and, after applying non-stretchable patches on the same bandage with similar resting pressure, EF was restored to its normal range (p < .001). Improvement in EF correlates with the pressure differences between standing and lying pressure and between muscle systole and diastole during exercise.
This study confirms that inelastic is much more effective than elastic compression for improving impaired venous haemodynamics. The test material can be applied with a predetermined pressure, which considerably enhances the consistency of application, and it is easily transformed into an inelastic system just by applying stiff patches without any stretch and without significantly increasing the comfortable supine pressure.
绷带施加的压力并不一致,因此在应用于患者时,压力变化极大。一种新型弹性绷带可独立于医护人员和包裹肢体的大小施加预设压力。该绷带系统包括一系列不可伸展的贴片,将这些贴片应用于绷带上会使其变硬。本研究旨在评估在实验环境下,新型绷带对小腿静脉射血分数(EF)的影响,以及其在一组患有浅静脉功能不全的患者中的耐受性。
在基线条件下使用应变计体积描记法测量 EF,在 25 例大隐静脉严重反流的患者中,在仰卧位下施加 20 和 30mmHg 的压力,并分别施加和不施加硬贴片,同时测量绷带内侧护胫区域的界面压力。
所有患者的 EF 值均明显低于正常个体。在仰卧位下,平均压力为 20 和 30mmHg 的弹性绷带可使 EF 略有改善,并且在相同绷带施加不可伸展的贴片后,EF 恢复至正常范围(p<0.001)。EF 的改善与站立和仰卧位之间的压力差以及运动时肌肉收缩和舒张期间的压力差相关。
本研究证实,不可伸展的绷带比弹性绷带更有效地改善受损的静脉血液动力学。测试材料可以施加预定的压力,这大大提高了应用的一致性,并且只需施加硬贴片即可轻松将其转化为不可伸展系统,而不会显著增加舒适的仰卧位压力。