Suppr超能文献

CT 透视引导下经皮前纵隔肿块穿刺活检。

CT fluoroscopy-guided core needle biopsy of anterior mediastinal masses.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho kita-ku, 700-8558 Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Feb;99(2):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the safety, diagnostic yield, and risk factors of diagnostic failure of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of anterior mediastinal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biopsy procedures and results of anterior mediastinal masses in 71 patients (32 women/39 men; mean [±standard deviation] age, 53.8±20.0years; range, 14-88years) were analyzed. Final diagnoses were based on surgical outcomes, imaging findings, or clinical follow-up findings. The biopsy results were compared with the final diagnosis, and the biopsy procedures grouped by pathologic findings into diagnostic success and failure groups. Multiple putative risk factors for diagnostic failure were then assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy-one biopsies (71 masses; mean size, 67.5±27.3mm; range 8.6-128.2mm) were analyzed. We identified 17 grade 1 and one grade 2 adverse events (25.4% overall) according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Sixty-nine biopsies (97.2%) provided samples fit for pathologic analysis. Diagnostic failure was found for eight (11.3%) masses; the 63 masses diagnosed successfully included thymic carcinoma (n=17), lung cancer (n=14), thymoma (n=12), malignant lymphoma (n=11), germ cell tumor (n=3), and others (n=6). Using a thinner needle (i.e., a 20-gauge needle) was the sole significant risk factor for diagnostic failure (P=0.039).

CONCLUSION

CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of anterior mediastinal masses was safe and had a high diagnostic yield; however, using a thinner biopsy needle significantly increased the risk of a failed diagnosis.

摘要

目的

回顾性评估 CT 透视引导下经皮前纵隔肿块活检的安全性、诊断率和诊断失败的危险因素。

材料与方法

分析 71 例(32 例女性/39 例男性;平均[±标准差]年龄 53.8±20.0 岁;范围 14-88 岁)前纵隔肿块患者的活检程序和结果。最终诊断基于手术结果、影像学发现或临床随访结果。将活检结果与最终诊断进行比较,并根据病理结果将活检程序分为诊断成功和失败组。然后评估了多个可能导致诊断失败的危险因素。

结果

分析了 71 次活检(71 个肿块;平均大小 67.5±27.3mm;范围 8.6-128.2mm)。根据国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准 4.0 版,我们共确定了 17 例 1 级和 1 例 2 级不良事件(总体发生率 25.4%)。69 次活检(97.2%)提供了适合病理分析的样本。8 个(11.3%)肿块诊断为失败,63 个成功诊断的肿块包括胸腺癌(n=17)、肺癌(n=14)、胸腺瘤(n=12)、恶性淋巴瘤(n=11)、生殖细胞瘤(n=3)和其他(n=6)。使用更细的针(即 20 号针)是诊断失败的唯一显著危险因素(P=0.039)。

结论

CT 透视引导下经皮前纵隔肿块活检安全且具有较高的诊断率;然而,使用更细的活检针会显著增加诊断失败的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验