Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.
Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Germany.
Resuscitation. 2018 Jan;122:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.11.040. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
Guidelines recommend detecting return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) by a rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the exhalation air. As CO is influenced by numerous factors, no absolute cut-off values of CO to detect ROSC are agreed on so far. As trends in CO might be less affected by influencing factors, we investigated an approach which is based on detecting CO-trends in real-time.
We conducted a retrospective case-control study on 169 CO time series from out of hospital cardiac arrests resuscitated by Muenster City Ambulance-Service, Germany. A recently developed statistical method for real-time trend-detection (SCARM) was applied to each time series. For each series, the percentage of time points with detected positive and negative trends was determined.
ROSC time series had larger percentages of positive trends than No-ROSC time series (p=0.003). The median percentage of positive trends was 15% in the ROSC time series (IQR: 5% to 23%) and 7% in the No-ROSC time series (IQR: 3% to 14%). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an optimal threshold of 13% to differentiate between ROSC and No-ROSC cases with a specificity of 58.4% and sensitivity of 73.9%; the area under the curve was 63.5%.
Patients with ROSC differed from patients without ROSC as to the percentage of detected CO trends, indicating the potential of our real-time trend-detection approach. Since the study was designed as a proof of principle and its calculated specificity and sensitivity are low, more research is required to implement CO-trend-detection into clinical use.
指南建议通过呼气空气中二氧化碳浓度的升高来检测自主循环的恢复(ROSC)。由于 CO 受到许多因素的影响,目前尚未就检测 ROSC 的 CO 绝对截止值达成一致意见。由于 CO 的趋势可能受影响因素的影响较小,因此我们研究了一种基于实时检测 CO 趋势的方法。
我们对德国明斯特市救护车上进行的 169 例院外心脏骤停复苏的 CO 时间序列进行了回顾性病例对照研究。应用最近开发的实时趋势检测统计方法(SCARM)对每个时间序列进行分析。对于每个系列,确定检测到阳性和阴性趋势的时间点百分比。
ROSC 时间序列的阳性趋势百分比大于非 ROSC 时间序列(p=0.003)。ROSC 时间序列的阳性趋势百分比中位数为 15%(IQR:5%至 23%),非 ROSC 时间序列为 7%(IQR:3%至 14%)。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析得出的最佳阈值为 13%,用于区分 ROSC 和非 ROSC 病例,特异性为 58.4%,敏感性为 73.9%;曲线下面积为 63.5%。
与非 ROSC 患者相比,ROSC 患者的 CO 趋势检测百分比不同,表明我们的实时趋势检测方法具有潜力。由于该研究旨在证明原理,且其计算出的特异性和敏感性较低,因此需要进一步研究将 CO 趋势检测应用于临床实践。