• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗研究中的低入组率:快速反应放射治疗项目的最新情况

Poor Accrual in Palliative Research Studies: An Update From the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program.

作者信息

Lien Karen, Zeng Liang, Bradley Nicole, Culleton Shaelyn, Popovic Marko, Di Giovanni Julia, Jamani Rehana, Cramarossa Gemma, Nguyen Janet, Koo Kaitlin, Jon Florencia, Chow Edward

机构信息

Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

World J Oncol. 2011 Oct;2(5):217-224. doi: 10.4021/wjon357w. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

DOI:10.4021/wjon357w
PMID:29147251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5649682/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In June 2003, the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) implemented changes to recruitment strategies in attempts to increase patient accrual to research studies. Such modifications included the use of a dedicated research assistant to screen for and identify eligible study patients, the introduction of more appropriate inclusion criteria, and the switch towards telephone interviews to minimize patient burden. The purpose of this study is to provide an update on patient accrual in the RRRP.

METHODS

All patients seen in the RRRP from January 2002 to December 2009 were recorded in a prospective database. Reasons for referral, eligibility for clinical trials, reasons for non-accrual, and various demographics information were recorded. Descriptive statistics summarized findings.

RESULTS

A total of 4726 patient visits were recorded from January 1st, 2002 to December 31st, 2009. Prior to changes, the overall rate of accrual into research studies was 14.9% versus 48.1% after changes were implemented. Patients were not accrued onto studies mainly to due ineligibility according to study protocol. Other reasons such as language barrier (12.1%), physician objection (3.5%), patient declining participation (11.3%) and lack of a research assistant (9.3%) were cited.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in clinical structure and study design can significantly impact accrual patterns in palliative radiotherapy studies. Despite these changes however, the majority of patients are still not enrolled in studies. Therefore additional efforts need to be made to maximize patient accrual and minimize attrition.

摘要

背景

2003年6月,快速反应放射治疗计划(RRRP)对招募策略进行了调整,试图增加参与研究的患者数量。这些调整包括使用专门的研究助理筛选和确定符合条件的研究患者,引入更合适的纳入标准,以及转向电话访谈以尽量减轻患者负担。本研究的目的是提供RRRP中患者招募情况的最新信息。

方法

将2002年1月至2009年12月在RRRP就诊的所有患者记录在前瞻性数据库中。记录转诊原因、临床试验资格、未被纳入的原因以及各种人口统计学信息。描述性统计总结研究结果。

结果

2002年1月1日至2009年12月31日共记录了4726次患者就诊。在调整之前,参与研究的总体比例为14.9%,调整后为48.1%。患者未被纳入研究主要是因为不符合研究方案的资格。还提到了其他原因,如语言障碍(12.1%)、医生反对(3.5%)、患者拒绝参与(11.3%)和缺乏研究助理(9.3%)。

结论

临床结构和研究设计的改变可显著影响姑息性放射治疗研究中的招募模式。然而,尽管有这些改变,大多数患者仍未参与研究。因此,需要做出更多努力以最大限度地增加患者招募并尽量减少损耗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8a/5649682/2afe00bc56d0/wjon-02-217-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8a/5649682/2afe00bc56d0/wjon-02-217-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8a/5649682/2afe00bc56d0/wjon-02-217-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Poor Accrual in Palliative Research Studies: An Update From the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program.姑息治疗研究中的低入组率:快速反应放射治疗项目的最新情况
World J Oncol. 2011 Oct;2(5):217-224. doi: 10.4021/wjon357w. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
2
Reasons for poor accrual in palliative radiation therapy research studies.
Support Cancer Ther. 2006 Jan 1;3(2):110-9. doi: 10.3816/SCT.2006.n.007.
3
Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: a review of 2008-2012.延续快速反应放射治疗计划中及时提供姑息性放射治疗的成功:2008-2012 年回顾。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(3):e206-11. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1342.
4
An innovative rapid response radiotherapy program to reduce waiting time for palliative radiotherapy.一项创新的快速反应放射治疗计划,以减少姑息性放射治疗的等待时间。
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):38-43. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0822-7. Epub 2005 Apr 23.
5
Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.癌症临床试验入组模式的前瞻性评估:识别入组的潜在障碍。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1728-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1728.
6
Communication with referring physicians in a palliative radiotherapy clinic.姑息性放疗诊所中与转诊医生的沟通。
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Sep;12(9):669-73. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0643-0.
7
Student Accomplishments in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: A 10-Year Review.
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):693-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0748-1.
8
Continued success of the rapid response radiotherapy program: a review of 2004-2008.快速反应放射治疗计划的持续成功:2004 - 2008年回顾
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jul;17(7):757-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0585-7. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Use of a clinical trial screening tool to enhance patient accrual.使用临床试验筛选工具来增加患者入组。
Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1630-1637. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33399. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias due to statistical handling of death and reirradiation in the assessment of duration of response after palliative radiotherapy: a scoping review and analysis of clinical data.由于在姑息性放疗后评估缓解持续时间时对死亡和再放疗的统计学处理而产生的偏倚:范围综述和临床数据分析。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Jan 1;96(1141):20220398. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220398. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Palliative radiotherapy for painful lymph node metastases.姑息性放疗治疗疼痛性淋巴结转移。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep 16;16(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01900-8.
3
Feasibility of the PalliSupport care pathway: results from a mixed-method study in acutely hospitalized older patients at the end of life.

本文引用的文献

1
Does nonparticipation in studies of advanced cancer lead to biased quality-of-life scores?不参与晚期癌症研究是否会导致偏倚的生活质量评分?
J Palliat Med. 2009 Nov;12(11):1023-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0108.
2
Effects of radiotherapy for brain metastases on quality of life (QoL). Prospective pilot study of the DEGRO QoL working party.脑转移瘤放疗对生活质量(QoL)的影响。DEGRO生活质量工作组的前瞻性试点研究。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Mar;185(3):190-7. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-1904-0.
3
Challenges to and lessons learned from conducting palliative care research.
姑息支持护理路径的可行性:一项针对急性住院临终老年患者的混合方法研究结果
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 15;6:129. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00676-0. eCollection 2020.
开展姑息治疗研究面临的挑战与经验教训。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Mar;37(3):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
4
Reasons for poor accrual in palliative radiation therapy research studies.
Support Cancer Ther. 2006 Jan 1;3(2):110-9. doi: 10.3816/SCT.2006.n.007.
5
A survey of the views of palliative care healthcare professionals towards referring cancer patients to participate in randomized controlled trials in palliative care.一项关于姑息治疗医护人员对于转诊癌症患者以参与姑息治疗随机对照试验的观点的调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Dec;16(12):1397-405. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0441-1. Epub 2008 May 1.
6
Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials.提高姑息治疗干预措施的有效性:定性研究在增强随机对照试验证据方面的潜在作用。
Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;22(2):123-31. doi: 10.1177/0269216307087319.
7
The influence of proxy perspective on patient-proxy agreement in the evaluation of health-related quality of life: an empirical study.代理视角对健康相关生活质量评估中患者-代理一致性的影响:一项实证研究。
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):209-16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158af13.
8
Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review.骨转移姑息性放疗试验:一项系统评价
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1423-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5281.
9
Identifying, recruiting, and retaining seriously-ill patients and their caregivers in longitudinal research.在纵向研究中识别、招募并留住重症患者及其照顾者。
Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):745-54. doi: 10.1177/0269216306073112.
10
Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care.接受门诊姑息治疗患者症状强度自我评估中的误差。
J Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;9(5):1059-65. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1059.