• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用临床试验筛选工具来增加患者入组。

Use of a clinical trial screening tool to enhance patient accrual.

机构信息

Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1630-1637. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33399. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.33399
PMID:33606910
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial patient accrual continues to be challenging despite the identification of multiple physician, patient, and system barriers. Expanded collection of demographic data, including socioeconomic status (employment, income, education) and comorbidities, can enhance our understanding of the identified barriers, inform the development of interventions to overcome these barriers, and recognize their impact on treatment outcomes. A clinical trials screening tool was developed to collect expanded demographic data and barriers to trial enrollment; it has been implemented in the National Cancer Institute Clinical Oncology Research Program. The purpose of this article is to describe the development and implementation of the tool and to share information obtained during the first 43 months of its use.

METHODS

There were 19,373 entries collected; 74% of those screened enrolled in a clinical trial. Demographic characteristics were compared between those screened and those enrolled. They varied significantly between the groups.

RESULTS

Reasons for nonenrollment included ineligibility (50%), eligible but declined (47%), eligible but physician declined to offer participation (2%), and eligible but the study was suspended (1%). The most common reasons for ineligibility were failure to meet the protocol-specific stage of cancer, the presence of comorbidities, and the symptom-eligibility score was not met. The most common reason for eligible patients declining participation was that they had no desire to participate in research.

CONCLUSIONS

The tool provides valuable information about the characteristics of individuals who are screened and enrolled in National Cancer Institute-sponsored trials, as well as about barriers to enrollment in trials. The data also inform protocol development and interventions at the patient, provider, and institutional level.

摘要

背景

尽管已经确定了多种医生、患者和系统障碍,但临床试验患者的入组仍然具有挑战性。扩展收集人口统计学数据,包括社会经济地位(就业、收入、教育)和合并症,可以增强我们对已确定障碍的理解,为克服这些障碍的干预措施的制定提供信息,并认识到它们对治疗结果的影响。已经开发了一种临床试验筛选工具来收集扩展的人口统计学数据和试验入组障碍;它已在国家癌症研究所临床肿瘤学研究计划中实施。本文的目的是描述该工具的开发和实施,并分享其使用的头 43 个月中获得的信息。

方法

共收集了 19373 条记录;74%的筛选者入组了临床试验。对筛选者和入组者的人口统计学特征进行了比较。两组之间存在显著差异。

结果

未入组的原因包括不符合条件(50%)、符合条件但拒绝(47%)、符合条件但医生拒绝提供参与(2%)以及符合条件但研究暂停(1%)。不符合条件的最常见原因是不符合方案特定的癌症分期、存在合并症以及症状合格评分未达到要求。符合条件的患者拒绝参与的最常见原因是他们没有参与研究的愿望。

结论

该工具提供了有关在国家癌症研究所资助的试验中筛选和入组的个体特征以及试验入组障碍的有价值的信息。该数据还为患者、提供者和机构层面的方案制定和干预措施提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Use of a clinical trial screening tool to enhance patient accrual.使用临床试验筛选工具来增加患者入组。
Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1630-1637. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33399. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Use of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program screening and accrual log to address cancer clinical trial accrual.利用美国国家癌症研究所社区癌症中心计划的筛查和入组日志来解决癌症临床试验的入组问题。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Mar;10(2):e73-80. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001194. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
3
Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Treatment Trials Accrual: A Closer Look at Participation Rates.胰腺癌临床治疗试验入组:参与率的深入观察。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;44(6):227-231. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000807.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in clinical trial enrollment, refusal rates, ineligibility, and reasons for decline among patients at sites in the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program.美国国家癌症研究所社区癌症中心项目中各站点患者在临床试验入组、拒绝率、不合格率及下降原因方面的种族/民族差异。
Cancer. 2014 Mar 15;120(6):877-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28483. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
5
Thoracic Radiation Oncology Clinical Trial Accrual and Reasons for Nonenrollment: Results of a Large, Prospective, Multiyear Analysis.胸放射肿瘤学临床试验入组和未入组原因:一项大型前瞻性多年分析的结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Aug 1;107(5):897-908. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Organizational and physician factors associated with patient enrollment in cancer clinical trials.与癌症临床试验患者入组相关的组织因素和医生因素。
Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):565-75. doi: 10.1177/1740774514536000. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
7
Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.癌症临床试验入组模式的前瞻性评估:识别入组的潜在障碍。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1728-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1728.
8
Enrolling Older Adults Onto National Cancer Institute-Funded Clinical Trials in Community Oncology Clinics: Barriers and Solutions.将老年人纳入社区肿瘤学诊所的美国国家癌症研究所资助的临床试验中:障碍和解决方案。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Dec 15;2022(60):117-124. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac019.
9
The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.美国国家癌症研究所-美国临床肿瘤学会癌症试验入组研讨会:总结和建议。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov;9(6):267-76. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001119. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
10
Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Trial Enrollment: NCORP Site Perspectives.青少年和青年癌症临床试验入组的障碍和促进因素:NCORP 站点观点。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Mar 22;5(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab027. eCollection 2021 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity and inclusivity in oncology: A narrative review and orientation for institutional measures in Germany.肿瘤学中的多样性与包容性:德国机构措施的叙述性综述与指南
Transl Oncol. 2025 Oct;60:102493. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102493. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
2
Sharing is caring: a network collaborative approach to identify and address barriers in accessing clinical trials in adolescents and young adults with leukemia and lymphoma.分享即关怀:一种网络协作方法,用于识别和解决青少年及青年白血病和淋巴瘤患者参与临床试验的障碍。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):27-33. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000526.
3
Are community oncology practices with or without clinical research programs different? A comparison of patient and practice characteristics.
社区肿瘤学实践是否有临床研究项目有何不同?患者和实践特征的比较。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jul 1;8(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae060.
4
Strategies for increasing accrual in cancer clinical trials: What is the evidence?增加癌症临床试验入组率的策略:有哪些证据?
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(10):e7298. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7298.
5
Increasing Racial and Ethnic Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Cancer Treatment Trials: Evaluation of an ASCO-Association of Community Cancer Centers Site Self-Assessment.提高癌症治疗试验中的种族和民族公平、多样性和包容性:对 ASCO-社区癌症中心协会现场自我评估的评估。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Apr;19(4):e581-e588. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00560. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
6
Through the Lens of Patient Partners: Challenges in Accrual of Older Adults to NCI Clinical Trials.透过患者伙伴的视角:在招募老年人群参与 NCI 临床试验中所面临的挑战。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Dec 15;2022(60):125-134. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac022.
7
Preface: Engaging Older Adults in Cancer Clinical Trials Conducted in the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network: Opportunities to Enhance Accrual.前言:让老年人参与美国国立癌症研究所临床试验网络开展的癌症临床试验:增加入组人数的机会
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Dec 15;2022(60):107-110. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac020.
8
Clinical Trial Enrollment, Ineligibility, and Reasons for Decline in Older vs Younger Patients With Cancer in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program.美国国立癌症研究所社区肿瘤研究项目中老年与年轻癌症患者的临床试验入组、不符合入组标准情况及拒绝入组原因
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2235714. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35714.
9
First Nationwide Molecular Screening Program in Spain for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the AGATA SOLTI-1301 Study.西班牙首个针对晚期乳腺癌患者的全国性分子筛查项目:AGATA SOLTI-1301研究结果
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 4;11:744112. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744112. eCollection 2021.
10
Strategies to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in clinical trials.提高临床试验中多样性、公平性和包容性的策略。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;128(2):216-221. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33905. Epub 2021 Sep 8.