• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康保险公司的财务表现:国营与联邦运营的医保交易所对比

Financial Performance of Health Insurers: State-Run Versus Federal-Run Exchanges.

作者信息

Hall Mark A, McCue Michael J, Palazzolo Jennifer R

机构信息

1 Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

2 Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Jun;75(3):384-393. doi: 10.1177/1077558717697013. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1177/1077558717697013
PMID:29148331
Abstract

Many insurers incurred financial losses in individual markets for health insurance during 2014, the first year of Affordable Care Act mandated changes. This analysis looks at key financial ratios of insurers to compare profitability in 2014 and 2013, identify factors driving financial performance, and contrast the financial performance of health insurers operating in state-run exchanges versus the federal exchange. Overall, the median loss of sampled insurers was -3.9%, no greater than their loss in 2013. Reduced administrative costs offset increases in medical losses. Insurers performed better in states with state-run exchanges than insurers in states using the federal exchange in 2014. Medical loss ratios are the underlying driver more than administrative costs in the difference in performance between states with federal versus state-run exchanges. Policy makers looking to improve the financial performance of the individual market should focus on features that differentiate the markets associated with state-run versus federal exchanges.

摘要

在《平价医疗法案》规定的变革实施的第一年,即2014年,许多保险公司在个人医疗保险市场遭受了财务损失。本分析着眼于保险公司的关键财务比率,以比较2014年和2013年的盈利能力,确定推动财务表现的因素,并对比在州立交易所运营的健康保险公司与联邦交易所运营的健康保险公司的财务表现。总体而言,抽样保险公司的中位数损失为-3.9%,不高于2013年的损失。行政成本的降低抵消了医疗损失的增加。2014年,在有州立交易所的州,保险公司的表现优于使用联邦交易所的州的保险公司。在联邦交易所与州立交易所所在州的表现差异中,医疗损失率比行政成本更是根本驱动因素。希望改善个人市场财务表现的政策制定者应关注区分州立交易所与联邦交易所相关市场的特征。

相似文献

1
Financial Performance of Health Insurers: State-Run Versus Federal-Run Exchanges.健康保险公司的财务表现:国营与联邦运营的医保交易所对比
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Jun;75(3):384-393. doi: 10.1177/1077558717697013. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
How Have Health Insurers Performed Financially Under the ACA' Market Rules?在《平价医疗法案》的市场规则下,健康保险公司的财务表现如何?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Oct 1;2017:1-9.
3
Key drivers of financial performance of insurers in the Affordable Care Act market exchange.平价医疗法案市场中保险公司财务表现的关键驱动因素。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2020 Aug;33(3):130-135. doi: 10.1177/0951484819887139. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
Early Experience of Financial Performance and Solvency of Medicaid-Focused Insurers Under ACA Expansion.《平价医疗法案》扩张下专注医疗补助计划的保险公司财务绩效与偿付能力的早期经验
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Dec;74(6):750-762. doi: 10.1177/1077558716663389. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
The Big Five Health Insurers' Membership And Revenue Trends: Implications For Public Policy.五大健康保险公司的会员和收入趋势:对公共政策的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Dec;36(12):2185-2194. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0858.
6
Promoting Value for Consumers: Comparing Individual Health Insurance Markets Inside and Outside the ACA's Exchanges.为消费者提升价值:比较《平价医疗法案》交易所内外的个人健康保险市场。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jun;12:1-10.
7
The challenge of churning. Insurers and states seek to ensure coverage continuity between Medicaid and private plans.人员频繁变动的挑战。保险公司和各州试图确保医疗补助计划与私人保险计划之间的保险覆盖连续性。
Mod Healthc. 2014 Jul 28;44(30):21-3.
8
Estimated Costs of a Reinsurance Program to Stabilize the Individual Health Insurance Market: National- and State-Level Estimates.稳定个人健康保险市场的再保险计划的估计成本:国家和州层面的估计。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019836060. doi: 10.1177/0046958019836060.
9
What drives insurer participation and premiums in the Federally-Facilitated Marketplace?是什么推动保险公司参与联邦政府推动的医保市场并确定保费?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017 Dec;17(4):395-412. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9215-y. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Same Game, Different Names: Cream-Skimming in the Post-ACA Individual Health Insurance Market.同名不同实:ACA 后个体健康保险市场中的择客承保。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020933765. doi: 10.1177/0046958020933765.