Suppr超能文献

cobas EGFR Mutation Assay 检测在非小细胞肺癌中的准确性与三种实验室自建检测方法的比较。

Accuracy of the cobas EGFR Mutation Assay in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Compared With Three Laboratory-developed Tests.

机构信息

Department of Chest Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.

Department of Pathology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Mar;19(2):170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.10.015. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The reliability of the cobas EGFR assay to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as an in vitro diagnostic test was compared with 3 laboratory-developed tests (LDTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After screening for EGFR mutations using formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded NSCLC tissue sections using the cobas EGFR assay, 151 samples were further tested with 3 LDTs; the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) clamp, PCR invader, and Cycleave assays. The cobas EGFR assay performance was evaluated by determining the concordance rate and κ-coefficient between the assays. In samples exhibiting discrepancies in the EGFR mutation status in the 4 assays, next-generation sequencing was performed to confirm mutated sequences.

RESULTS

Concordance rates and κ-coefficients between the cobas EGFR assay and the other tests were 96.0% and 0.921 for the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp assay, 94.0% and 0.881 for the PCR invader assay, and 96.7% and 0.934 for the Cycleave assay, respectively. Data showed very good agreement with the other assays. Precise mutated sequences or exons in the EGFR gene matched in 137 samples (90.7%). Different results were obtained in 4 samples (2.6%), owing to systemic limitations of the assay. Next-generation sequencing of 10 (6.6%) samples with discordant results exhibited a concordance rate of 60% to 80% in each assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The cobas EGFR assay showed high concordance rates and κ-coefficients between the 3 compared LDTs and can be used to select patients who would benefit from EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

摘要

背景

cobas EGFR 检测试剂盒作为一种体外诊断检测方法,其检测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的可靠性与 3 种实验室开发的检测方法(LDT)进行了比较。

材料和方法

在使用 cobas EGFR 检测试剂盒对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋的 NSCLC 组织切片进行 EGFR 突变筛选后,对 151 个样本进一步用 3 种 LDT(肽核酸锁核酸聚合酶链反应(PCR)夹、PCR 入侵物和 Cycleave 检测)进行检测。通过确定各检测之间的一致性率和 κ 系数来评估 cobas EGFR 检测试剂盒的性能。在 4 种检测方法中 EGFR 突变状态不一致的样本中,进行下一代测序以确认突变序列。

结果

cobas EGFR 检测试剂盒与其他检测方法的一致性率和 κ 系数分别为肽核酸锁核酸 PCR 夹检测 96.0%和 0.921、PCR 入侵物检测 94.0%和 0.881、Cycleave 检测 96.7%和 0.934。数据显示与其他检测方法具有非常好的一致性。在 137 个样本(90.7%)中,精确的 EGFR 基因突变序列或外显子相匹配。在 4 个样本(2.6%)中,由于检测方法的系统局限性,得到了不同的结果。在有差异的 10 个样本(6.6%)中进行的下一代测序显示,在每个检测中,一致性率为 60%至 80%。

结论

cobas EGFR 检测试剂盒与 3 种比较的 LDT 之间具有较高的一致性率和 κ 系数,可用于选择将从 EGFR-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂中获益的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验