Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6603-3.
Recent studies indicate the benefit of treatment with osimertinib over that with conventional epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for untreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cobas ver2 is the only companion diagnostic method for detecting EGFR mutations with osimertinib treatment. We clinically experience false negative cases with this test, but its actual sensitivity is unknown. Moreover, no study has suggested the importance of tumour dissection, and most facilities do not routinely perform them on small biopsies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of cobas in clinical practice and clarify the role of dissection as a component of the cobas testing.
We examined 132 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC diagnosed by bronchoscopy and confirmed with PCR clamp. Patients were tested with cobas and the EGFR-positive rate was calculated. Samples with undetected EGFR mutations were retested after tumour dissection and the rate of samples whose EGFR mutation was corrected to positive was assessed. To evaluate tumour cellularity, the tumour content ratio was assessed by calculating tumour cell count over the total cell count on the slide.
The positive rate of EGFR mutation identification was 76% with cobas, although EGFR mutation-negative patients retained responses to TKI therapy equivalent to positive patients did; however, the tumour content ratio of negative samples was significantly lower than that of positive samples. Twenty-nine negative samples underwent dissection and 24% were corrected to positive. Moreover, 53% of the samples with a tumour content ratio below 10% was negative for cobas, but 33% of these turned positive after dissection.
Cobas had a high false negative rate in clinical practice, and tumour content ratio might be associated with this rate. Dissection could improve the sensitivity of cobas, especially in samples with low tumour cellularity.
最近的研究表明,对于未经治疗的 EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),奥希替尼治疗比传统的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗更有效。Cobas ver2 是唯一用于检测奥希替尼治疗的 EGFR 突变的伴随诊断方法。我们在临床实践中遇到了该检测的假阴性病例,但其实验敏感性尚不清楚。此外,尚无研究表明肿瘤解剖的重要性,而且大多数机构并未常规对小活检进行解剖。本研究旨在评估 cobas 在临床实践中的敏感性,并阐明肿瘤解剖作为 cobas 检测的组成部分的作用。
我们检查了 132 例经支气管镜诊断为 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 并经 PCR 夹心法确认的患者。对患者进行 cobas 检测,并计算 EGFR 阳性率。对未检测到 EGFR 突变的样本进行肿瘤解剖后再次检测,并评估 EGFR 突变纠正为阳性的样本比例。为了评估肿瘤细胞密度,通过计算载玻片上的肿瘤细胞计数与总细胞计数的比值来评估肿瘤含量比。
虽然 cobas 检测 EGFR 突变的阳性率为 76%,但 EGFR 突变阴性的患者仍保留了与阳性患者相当的 TKI 治疗反应;然而,阴性样本的肿瘤含量比明显低于阳性样本。29 例阴性样本进行了解剖,其中 24%被纠正为阳性。此外,肿瘤含量比低于 10%的样本中,有 53%为 cobas 阴性,但其中 33%经解剖后转为阳性。
Cobas 在临床实践中存在较高的假阴性率,肿瘤含量比可能与该比率相关。肿瘤解剖可以提高 cobas 的敏感性,特别是在肿瘤细胞密度较低的样本中。