Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Blood. 2018 Jan 18;131(3):301-310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
This FIRST trial final analysis examined survival outcomes in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 72 weeks (18 cycles; Rd18), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT; 72 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; primary comparison: Rd continuous vs MPT). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint (final analysis prespecified ≥60 months' follow-up). Patients were randomized to Rd continuous (n = 535), Rd18 (n = 541), or MPT (n = 547). At a median follow-up of 67 months, PFS was significantly longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.79; < .00001) and was similarly extended vs Rd18. Median OS was 10 months longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (59.1 vs 49.1 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92; = .0023), and similar with Rd18 (62.3 months). In patients achieving complete or very good partial responses, Rd continuous had an ≈30-month longer median time to next treatment vs Rd18 (69.5 vs 39.9 months). Over half of all patients who received second-line treatment were given a bortezomib-based therapy. Second-line outcomes were improved in patients receiving bortezomib after Rd continuous and Rd18 vs after MPT. No new safety concerns, including risk for secondary malignancies, were observed. Treatment with Rd continuous significantly improved survival outcomes vs MPT, supporting Rd continuous as a standard of care for patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00689936 and EudraCT as 2007-004823-39.
这项 FIRST 试验的最终分析检查了不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的生存结果,这些患者接受来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松治疗,直至疾病进展(Rd 连续治疗)、Rd 治疗 72 周(18 个周期;Rd18)或马法兰、泼尼松和沙利度胺(MPT;72 周)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS;主要比较:Rd 连续治疗与 MPT)。总生存期(OS)是一个关键次要终点(最终分析规定随访时间≥60 个月)。患者被随机分配至 Rd 连续治疗组(n=535)、Rd18 组(n=541)或 MPT 组(n=547)。在中位随访 67 个月时,Rd 连续治疗与 MPT 相比,PFS 显著延长(风险比[HR],0.69;95%置信区间[CI],0.59-0.79;<.00001),与 Rd18 相比也同样延长。Rd 连续治疗与 MPT 相比,中位 OS 延长了 10 个月(59.1 个月 vs 49.1 个月;HR,0.78;95%CI,0.67-0.92;=0.0023),与 Rd18 相似。在达到完全或非常好的部分缓解的患者中,Rd 连续治疗的中位时间至下一次治疗时间比 Rd18 长约 30 个月(69.5 个月 vs 39.9 个月)。接受二线治疗的患者中超过一半接受了硼替佐米为基础的治疗。与 MPT 相比,Rd 连续治疗和 Rd18 治疗后接受硼替佐米治疗的患者二线治疗结果得到改善。未观察到新的安全性问题,包括继发恶性肿瘤的风险。与 MPT 相比,Rd 连续治疗显著改善了生存结果,支持 Rd 连续治疗作为不适合移植的 NDMM 患者的标准治疗。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 #NCT00689936,在 EudraCT 上注册为 2007-004823-39。