• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma.FIRST 试验中多发性骨髓瘤一线治疗的生存结局最终分析。
Blood. 2018 Jan 18;131(3):301-310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
2
Continuous lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM: FIRST trial subanalysis of Canadian/US patients.不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者中使用来那度胺联合低剂量地塞米松治疗:加拿大/美国患者 FIRST 试验的亚组分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(23):8923-8930. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3511. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Continuous treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in Asia: subanalysis of the FIRST trial.来那度胺与低剂量地塞米松持续治疗亚洲新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者:FIRST试验的亚组分析
Br J Haematol. 2017 Mar;176(5):743-749. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14465. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial.在随机、III 期 FIRST 试验中,来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松或马法兰、泼尼松和沙利度胺的更新结果和年龄的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3609-3617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7295.
5
Benefit of continuous treatment for responders with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the randomized FIRST trial.在随机的FIRST试验中,持续治疗对新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤缓解者的益处。
Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2435-2442. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.111. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
6
Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.硼替佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松与单纯来那度胺和地塞米松治疗新诊断的无立即自体干细胞移植意向的骨髓瘤患者(SWOG S0777):一项随机、开放标签的3期试验
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):519-527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31594-X. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
7
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma.来那度胺联合地塞米松治疗不适合移植的骨髓瘤患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402551.
8
A matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) of daratumumab-bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (D-VMP) versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone continuous (Rd continuous), lenalidomide-dexamethasone 18 months (Rd 18), and melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT).达雷妥尤单抗-硼替佐米-马法兰-泼尼松(D-VMP)与来那度胺-地塞米松连续治疗(Rd 连续)、来那度胺-地塞米松 18 个月(Rd 18)和马法兰-泼尼松-沙利度胺(MPT)的匹配调整间接治疗比较(MAIC)。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Mar;61(3):714-720. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1682571. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.来那度胺联合伊沙佐米和地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者。
Blood. 2021 Jul 1;137(26):3616-3628. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008787.
10
Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.自体造血干细胞移植对比硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松(联合或不联合硼替佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松巩固治疗)以及来那度胺维持治疗用于新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(EMN02/HO95):一项多中心、随机、开放标签的3期研究
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e456-e468. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30099-5. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Treatment Landscape for the Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patient: From Quad Regimens to T-Cell Engagers and CAR-T.老年多发性骨髓瘤患者不断演变的治疗格局:从四联方案到T细胞衔接器和嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;17(15):2579. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152579.
2
Current and future role of carfilzomib-based quadruplet combinations as therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.基于卡非佐米的四联组合疗法在新诊断多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的当前及未来作用
Hemasphere. 2025 Jul 16;9(7):e70178. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70178. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
High-Risk Genetic Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Classification to Innovative Treatment with Monoclonal Antibodies and T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.高危遗传性多发性骨髓瘤:从分子分类到单克隆抗体和T细胞重定向疗法的创新治疗
Cells. 2025 May 25;14(11):776. doi: 10.3390/cells14110776.
4
Investigating CAR-T Treatment Access for Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Real-World Evidence.利用真实世界证据调查多发性骨髓瘤患者获得CAR-T治疗的情况。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 19:2025.04.16.25325784. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.16.25325784.
5
How First-Line Therapy is Changing in non-Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients.一线治疗在不符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤患者中是如何变化的。
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 1;17(1):e2025025. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2025.025. eCollection 2025.
6
Clinical outcomes in older adults treated outside clinical studies: highlighting the octogenarian experience.临床研究之外接受治疗的老年人的临床结局:突出八旬老人的经历。
Blood Adv. 2025 Jun 10;9(11):2677-2685. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015968.
7
Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options.多发性骨髓瘤:治疗选择数量迅速增加带来的预后改善
Target Oncol. 2025 Mar;20(2):247-267. doi: 10.1007/s11523-024-01122-4. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
8
Efficacy and safety of a modified DVD regimen followed by lenalidomide for the treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.改良DVD方案序贯来那度胺治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤的疗效与安全性
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jan 25;80:100575. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100575. eCollection 2025.
9
Proceedings from the First Onco Summit: LATAM Chapter, 19-20 May 2023, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.第一届肿瘤学峰会会议记录:拉丁美洲分会,2023年5月19日至20日,巴西里约热内卢
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;16(17):3063. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173063.
10
Comparing the clinical trial efficacy real-world effectiveness of treatments for multiple myeloma: a population-based study.比较多发性骨髓瘤治疗的临床试验疗效与真实世界有效性:一项基于人群的研究。
Haematologica. 2025 Jan 1;110(1):228-233. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285768.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.多发性骨髓瘤:ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv52-iv61. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx096.
2
Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.硼替佐米联合来那度胺和地塞米松与单纯来那度胺和地塞米松治疗新诊断的无立即自体干细胞移植意向的骨髓瘤患者(SWOG S0777):一项随机、开放标签的3期试验
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):519-527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31594-X. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.达雷妥尤单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 6;375(14):1319-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751.
4
Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial.在随机、III 期 FIRST 试验中,来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松或马法兰、泼尼松和沙利度胺的更新结果和年龄的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3609-3617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7295.
5
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.来那度胺、伊沙佐米和地塞米松联合治疗多发性骨髓瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1621-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516282.
6
Rate of CRL4(CRBN) substrate Ikaros and Aiolos degradation underlies differential activity of lenalidomide and pomalidomide in multiple myeloma cells by regulation of c-Myc and IRF4.CRL4(CRBN)底物Ikaros和Aiolos的降解速率通过调控c-Myc和IRF4决定了来那度胺和泊马度胺在多发性骨髓瘤细胞中的不同活性。
Blood Cancer J. 2015 Oct 2;5(10):e354. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.66.
7
Elotuzumab Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.依鲁替尼联合来那度胺和地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、开放标签的 II 期研究
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):621-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505654. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
8
Frontline therapy of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的一线治疗。
Blood. 2015 May 14;125(20):3076-84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-568915. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
9
Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma.卡非佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗复发多发性骨髓瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):142-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411321. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
10
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma.来那度胺联合地塞米松治疗不适合移植的骨髓瘤患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402551.

FIRST 试验中多发性骨髓瘤一线治疗的生存结局最终分析。

Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma.

机构信息

Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.

Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Blood. 2018 Jan 18;131(3):301-310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. Epub 2017 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047
PMID:29150421
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5774211/
Abstract

This FIRST trial final analysis examined survival outcomes in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 72 weeks (18 cycles; Rd18), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT; 72 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; primary comparison: Rd continuous vs MPT). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint (final analysis prespecified ≥60 months' follow-up). Patients were randomized to Rd continuous (n = 535), Rd18 (n = 541), or MPT (n = 547). At a median follow-up of 67 months, PFS was significantly longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.79; < .00001) and was similarly extended vs Rd18. Median OS was 10 months longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (59.1 vs 49.1 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92; = .0023), and similar with Rd18 (62.3 months). In patients achieving complete or very good partial responses, Rd continuous had an ≈30-month longer median time to next treatment vs Rd18 (69.5 vs 39.9 months). Over half of all patients who received second-line treatment were given a bortezomib-based therapy. Second-line outcomes were improved in patients receiving bortezomib after Rd continuous and Rd18 vs after MPT. No new safety concerns, including risk for secondary malignancies, were observed. Treatment with Rd continuous significantly improved survival outcomes vs MPT, supporting Rd continuous as a standard of care for patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00689936 and EudraCT as 2007-004823-39.

摘要

这项 FIRST 试验的最终分析检查了不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的生存结果,这些患者接受来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松治疗,直至疾病进展(Rd 连续治疗)、Rd 治疗 72 周(18 个周期;Rd18)或马法兰、泼尼松和沙利度胺(MPT;72 周)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS;主要比较:Rd 连续治疗与 MPT)。总生存期(OS)是一个关键次要终点(最终分析规定随访时间≥60 个月)。患者被随机分配至 Rd 连续治疗组(n=535)、Rd18 组(n=541)或 MPT 组(n=547)。在中位随访 67 个月时,Rd 连续治疗与 MPT 相比,PFS 显著延长(风险比[HR],0.69;95%置信区间[CI],0.59-0.79;<.00001),与 Rd18 相比也同样延长。Rd 连续治疗与 MPT 相比,中位 OS 延长了 10 个月(59.1 个月 vs 49.1 个月;HR,0.78;95%CI,0.67-0.92;=0.0023),与 Rd18 相似。在达到完全或非常好的部分缓解的患者中,Rd 连续治疗的中位时间至下一次治疗时间比 Rd18 长约 30 个月(69.5 个月 vs 39.9 个月)。接受二线治疗的患者中超过一半接受了硼替佐米为基础的治疗。与 MPT 相比,Rd 连续治疗和 Rd18 治疗后接受硼替佐米治疗的患者二线治疗结果得到改善。未观察到新的安全性问题,包括继发恶性肿瘤的风险。与 MPT 相比,Rd 连续治疗显著改善了生存结果,支持 Rd 连续治疗作为不适合移植的 NDMM 患者的标准治疗。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 #NCT00689936,在 EudraCT 上注册为 2007-004823-39。