Suppr超能文献

德语区泌尿外科学会发布的患者教育材料可读性评估

Readability Assessment of Patient Education Material Published by German-Speaking Associations of Urology.

作者信息

Betschart Patrick, Zumstein Valentin, Hasan Ali Omar, Schmid Hans-Peter, Abt Dominik

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2018;100(1):79-84. doi: 10.1159/000480095. Epub 2017 Nov 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the readability and comprehensibility of web-based German-language patient education material (PEM) issued by urological associations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

German PEM available in June 2017 was obtained from the European Association of Urology (EAU), German (DGU), Swiss (SGU) and Austrian (ÖGU) Association of Urology websites. Each educational text was analyzed separately using 4 well-established readability assessment tools: the Amstad Test (AT), G-SMOG (SMOG), Wiener Sachtextformel (WS) and the Lesbarkeitsindex (LIX).

RESULTS

The EAU has issued PEM on 8 topics, the DGU 22 and the SGU 5. The ÖGU refers to the PEMs published by the DGU. Calculation of grade levels (SMOG, WS, LIX) showed readability scores of the 7th-14th grades. The easiest readability was found for materials on Nocturia and Urinary Incontinence issued by the EAU. Kidney Cancer and Infertility, issued by the DGU had the hardest readability. The EAU achieved the best median AT score, followed by the SGU, and the DGU.

CONCLUSION

Remarkable differences between readability were found for the PEMs issued by EAU, DGU and SGU. Materials published by the EAU were the easiest to read. Improving the readability of certain PEMs is of crucial importance to meet patient needs and act in the interests of a growing, self-informing German-speaking patient community.

摘要

目的

评估泌尿外科协会发布的德语网络患者教育材料(PEM)的可读性和可理解性。

材料与方法

2017年6月可获取的德语PEM来自欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)、德国(DGU)、瑞士(SGU)和奥地利(ÖGU)泌尿外科协会网站。使用4种成熟的可读性评估工具分别对每篇教育文本进行分析:阿姆斯塔德测试(AT)、G-SMOG(SMOG)、维也纳专业文本公式(WS)和易读性指数(LIX)。

结果

EAU发布了8个主题的PEM,DGU发布了22个,SGU发布了5个。ÖGU引用了DGU发布的PEM。年级水平计算(SMOG、WS、LIX)显示可读性分数在7至14年级。EAU发布的关于夜尿症和尿失禁的材料可读性最容易。DGU发布的肾癌和不孕症材料可读性最难。EAU的AT中位数得分最高,其次是SGU和DGU。

结论

EAU、DGU和SGU发布的PEM在可读性上存在显著差异。EAU发布的材料最易读。提高某些PEM的可读性对于满足患者需求以及为不断壮大的德语自我教育患者群体谋福利至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验