Modir Hesameddin, Moshiri Esmail, Malekianzadeh Bita, Noori Gholamreza, Mohammadbeigi Abolfazl
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Department of surgery, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Med Gas Res. 2017 Oct 17;7(3):150-155. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.215744. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
Airway management is essential for safe anesthesia and endotracheal intubation is the most important procedure by which critically ill patients can be better managed, especially if done quickly and successfully. This study aimed to compare the techniques of intubation through laryngeal mask airway (LMA) using a bougie video laryngoscopy (VL) regarding to intubation success and the quality of intubation indices in patients with difficult airways. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 96 patients aged 16-76 years with Mallampati class 3 or 4 who underwent elective surgery. Once the demographics were recorded, patients were randomly divided into two groups and the first group intubated with VL, and the second group intubated through laryngeal mask using a bougie. Then vital signs, arterial oxygen saturation, the time required for successful intubation, and ease of intubation were recorded. Here -tests, chi-square, Fisher exact tests, and analysis of variance for repeated measurement were used to analyze the data in SPSS software. The overall success rates of intubation in VL and LMA groups were 46 (96%) and 44 (92%), respectively. The mean duration of intubation for the LMA and VL groups was 18.70 ± 6.73 and 14.21 ± 4.14 seconds, respectively ( < 0.001). Moreover, visual analogue scale score for pain in throat was significantly lower in VL group than LMA (1.65 ± 0.76 . 1.33 ± 0.52). Moreover, easy intubation in bougie group was 50%, while the easy intubation in VL was 73% ( = 0.023). In addition, incidence of cough was 31% in the LMA with bougie group and 9% in VL group ( = 0.005). The VL technique is an easier method and has a shorter intubation time than LMA using bougie, and causes a lower incidence of coughing, laryngospasm in patients that need intubation. Moreover, cough and discomfort in the throat tend to be less in VL, and the LMA could be used as replacement of VL in hard situations.
气道管理对于安全麻醉至关重要,气管插管是对重症患者进行更好管理的最重要操作,尤其是在快速且成功完成时。本研究旨在比较使用探条经喉罩气道(LMA)插管与视频喉镜(VL)插管技术在困难气道患者中的插管成功率及插管指标质量。这项随机临床试验对96例年龄在16 - 76岁、Mallampati分级为3或4级且接受择期手术的患者进行。记录人口统计学数据后,将患者随机分为两组,第一组采用VL插管,第二组使用探条经喉罩气道插管。然后记录生命体征、动脉血氧饱和度、成功插管所需时间以及插管的难易程度。使用t检验、卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和重复测量方差分析在SPSS软件中分析数据。VL组和LMA组的总体插管成功率分别为46例(96%)和44例(92%)。LMA组和VL组的平均插管持续时间分别为18.70±6.73秒和14.21±4.14秒(P<0.001)。此外,VL组咽喉疼痛视觉模拟量表评分显著低于LMA组(1.65±0.76对1.33±0.52)。而且,探条组的插管容易程度为50%,而VL组为73%(P = 0.023)。另外,LMA探条组咳嗽发生率为31%,VL组为9%(P = 0.005)。VL技术是一种更简便的方法,与使用探条的LMA相比插管时间更短,并且在需要插管的患者中引起咳嗽、喉痉挛的发生率更低。此外,VL组咽喉的咳嗽和不适往往更少,在困难情况下LMA可作为VL的替代方法。