Rieger A, Brunne B, Hass I, Brummer G, Spies C, Striebel H W, Eyrich K
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Benjamin Franklin Medical Center, Free University of Berlin, Germany.
J Clin Anesth. 1997 Feb;9(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00209-7.
To investigate the incidence and severity of laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following anesthesia with the use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) compared with endotracheal intubation in adults.
Prospective study with randomized patient selection.
University medical center.
202 adult ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective surgery of either an extremity or breast, or a transurethral resection.
Following intravenous induction of anesthesia, a standard LMA size #3, #4, or #5 corresponding to the patient's body weight, was inserted in 103 patients; 99 patients were intubated with a polyvinylchloride endotracheal tube [7.5 mm inner diameter (ID) in women and 8.0 mm ID in men]. Cuff pressures in the LMA group were initially reduced to a minimum pressure at which an air-tight seal between the LMA and the laryngeal inlet was provided at a positive pressure of 20 cm H2O during manual bag ventilation. Cuffs of endotracheal tubes were inflated and controlled to a volume needed to prevent gas leak at 35 cm H2O pressure.
Cuff pressures were continuously monitored in both groups. Patients assessed their laryngo-pharyngeal complaints on a 101-point numerical rating scale on the evening after surgery and the following two days. No difference was found in the incidence and severity of sore throat on the evening following surgery or on the two following days. Dysphonia was more frequent following intubation than following LMA insertion on the day of surgery (46.8% vs. 25.3%) and on the first postoperative day (28.1% vs. 11.6%) (p < 0.05). However, the incidence of dysphonia increased with the duration of anesthesia in LMA patients but not in intubated patients. The incidence of dysphagia was significantly higher following LMA insertion compared with endotracheal intubation on the day of surgery (23.8% vs. 12.5%), and on the first postoperative day (22.3% vs. 10.4%). The severity of the individual complaints of minor laryngo-pharyngeal morbidity was comparable between groups. The type of airway management during anesthesia did not affect patient satisfaction with the anesthesia received.
There is a distinct pattern of laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following the use of the LMA and endotracheal intubation. With regard to minor laryngo-pharyngeal morbidity, the advantage of the LMA to endotracheal intubation is questionable.
比较成人使用喉罩气道(LMA)与气管插管麻醉后喉咽不适的发生率和严重程度。
随机选择患者的前瞻性研究。
大学医学中心。
202例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I、II和III级的成年患者,计划进行四肢或乳房择期手术或经尿道切除术。
静脉诱导麻醉后,103例患者插入与患者体重相应的标准3号、4号或5号LMA;99例患者使用聚氯乙烯气管导管插管(女性内径7.5mm,男性内径8.0mm)。LMA组的套囊压力最初降至最低压力,在手动气囊通气时,该压力能在20cm H₂O正压下在LMA与喉入口之间形成气密密封。气管导管的套囊充气并控制至在35cm H₂O压力下防止气体泄漏所需的容积。
两组均持续监测套囊压力。患者在术后当晚及随后两天使用101分数字评分量表评估其喉咽不适情况。术后当晚及随后两天,两组患者咽痛的发生率和严重程度无差异。在手术当天(46.8%对25.3%)和术后第一天(28.1%对11.6%),插管后声音嘶哑的发生率高于插入LMA后(p<0.05)。然而,LMA患者声音嘶哑的发生率随麻醉时间延长而增加,气管插管患者则不然。在手术当天(23.8%对12.5%)和术后第一天(22.3%对10.4%),插入LMA后吞咽困难的发生率显著高于气管插管后。两组轻度喉咽并发症个体主诉的严重程度相当。麻醉期间的气道管理类型不影响患者对所接受麻醉的满意度。
使用LMA和气管插管后喉咽不适存在明显差异。就轻度喉咽并发症而言,LMA相对于气管插管的优势值得怀疑。